It's funny really Catholics get blamed for telling people not to use condoms = rise in aids When they also tell people only to have sex when married which would in itself, if followed, gradually reduce aids spreading it gets ignored by critics If the Church said use them it wouldn't make a blind bit of difference to the spread of aids
Ok, I stand corrected ... I take my hat off to your superior knowledge on STDs and Crabs! <pudbowsdowntotoby'sinfectedringpeice> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pediculosis_pubis
The Arabs and Ottomans took White Slaves The first people to profit from Black slavery....were their Black captors
I can sense a "Can Slavery Ever Be Justified?" thread coming on but I'll be buggered if I'm going to post it.
Why should people deny themselves pleasure when it isn't harming anyone else and there's a perfectly adequate method of avoiding any unwanted side effects e.g. children, STDs etc. After all, humans are genetically pre-programmed to indulge in sex on a regular basis and abstaining from it goes against our natural instincts.
Because if you want to be in the club you follow the rules Every sperm is sacred Every sperm is great If a sperm gets wasted God will be irate
So why is the pull-out method okay? Do you think the spermatoza are going to survive as some sort of living crust on your bedsheets?
which is why religions gave the institution of marriage. The issue here is 2 fold imo. firstly the use of condoms and secondly promiscuity even if the church said ok condoms are allowed, it still doesnt say ok sleep around are people saying then that condoms should be allowed in a marriage or so people can sleep around?
