It's an erroneous sentence. It's only just dawned on you why so now you're backtracking. Stop embarrassing yourself and try and retain a bit of dignity for ****'s sake.
think you will find the argiment is me saying whatyou said i said your prejudice is not the issue as i said i dont need to 'fit in' like you. i do it for MY entertainment and couldnt care less what people think also the likes of ST i can do with hating/disliking me
how am i backtracking? i asked you twice and you couldnt point to anything i helped you out a bit its still not erroneous
Just remembered who TFWNN reminds me of: White Gooman from Dodgeball White Goodman: Go ahead, make your jokes, Mr. Jokey... Joke-maker. But let me hit you with some knowledge. Quit now. Save yourself the embarrassment of losing with these losers in Las Vegas, La Fleur. Peter La Fleur: Alliteration aside, I'll take my chances in the tournament. White Goodman: Yeah, you will take your chances. Peter La Fleur: I know. I just said that. White Goodman: I know you just said that. Peter La Fleur: Okay, I'm not sure where you're going with this. White Goodman: Well, I'm not sure where *you're* going with this. Peter La Fleur: That's what I said. White Goodman: That's what I'm saying to *you*. Peter La Fleur: All right. White Goodman: ...Touché.
hiya huth sorry its neither Its me and I was being lazy I was eating and using my little finger to type, which is dangerous as even when using both hands or all of one hand I make errors in spelling etc
anyhoo fellas a off for now probably be back onto see what ludicrous and ridiculous claims some will have come on with Unlike Jip I will be doing as I say, and I expect a few responses of a certain type, with a discussion with 1 or more other posters as he knows I am not on here in a bitz
I did do what I said. I only said I wasn't going point for point with you. And I don't need to wait till you're gone to mock you, I've been daringly indulging whilst you've been here anyway.
You haven't explained anything. You've made some ridiculous and far-fetched excuses for a straight answer to a straight question. Why no charges? Because there's very little proof, bar his confession and no evidence of anyone actually taking him up on his hate-mongering. The 1945 found plenty of evidence. Not sure why you believe otherwise. Try reading the report of the initial excavations. Where are you getting this information from? Link, please. The numbers vary, but they're expected to. It's hard to tell exactly how many people make up a big pile of ashes. He's made claims and refused to publish his findings. That's not evidence. That's a neo-Nazi making wild claims. Why hasn't he published his report?
makes a change you normally start commenting on other people post re your argument with me in a strange point scoring way and you were going to go spend time on your kids etc, but keep coming back
Are you claiming that non publishment makes the study void? As mentioned he has written preliminary reports in german and french, which have been presented, why he hasnt gone the whole hog? who knows However what is interesting is that the last person to do a study at treblinka was the professor from birmingham uni as part of her PHD, she has not published hers either and its supposed to contradict Krege It also goes to show that it could be done to silence one side or the other and studies have been carried out where there is no doubts about mass graves
