Why should Laudrup accept a second rate centre half on his coaching panel? If Monk wanted coaching expirience he should have coached a youth team, preferably somebody else's.
If all the failings were ML's fault why is it that under the new regime we have won only 1 in 7. No improvement for me. Why is Lita back in the fold, he's awful. He has been loaned out to several clubs and he returned early from most of them if not all. None made a bid to take him on a permanent basis, he was rejected by Laudrup and eventually by Rogers as well. I think this says it all. As much I would like Monk to succeed can't see it happening. I was on the first floor foyer directly after the match when HJ came in he had a face like thunder, not a happy chappie I'm afraid.
Interesting: http://www.swanseacity.net/news/article/vacancy-hr-admin-1395489.aspx Wonder if whoever was in charge of HR had warned (or not warned) them about sacking ML...
Well, he only has himself to blame .... the ****ing moron should look in the mirror if he wants to look at the cause of our current problem. He created this situation .... "in the best interest of the club" .... and now he's ****ing pissed when his "protege" is using Lita instead of the other championship rejects he bought in January. Sorry to Emnes and Ngog, it's not their fault that they are part of this **** show, all they are doing is trying to improve their lot ... but really, we strengthen by going into the Championship for players. Perhaps Monk didn't get the memo or read the Lita part properly .... the part that says don't play Lita.
