Couldn't agree more. Clubs like Fulham play in a sparcely populated old stadium with the atmosphere of a church and they seem to do alright.
Somehow and since the Chelsea game, all we get on EVERY THREAD and not just this one. Seems to disolve into the BILS and BOBS, suppose after the Stoke game it will be much of the same, nomatter what the result, pity realy.
I don't believe I'm reading this! These ar**holes are on more money per week than many in the north of England are getting per year - and you want us to help the poor dears do the job? We've won one home game in NINE MONTHS, and you've the damn gall to tell me it's my fault! Let's get something straight here. The people at that club get paid for turning up to games. We do not. Therefore, the responsibility to make things happen is entirely theirs. It is not for us to do it for them. We will shout when they (in return for £40.000 a week) give us something to shout about. We will sing when they (in return for £40,000 a week) make us happy enough to sing. Not the other way round. Sing? - What the hell are we supposed to sing, The Last Post? They're pathetic. YOU ARE SO RIGHT
One statistic that the Bruce advocates should read. One win at home in 2011. Is that enought to give him an improved 5 year contract?
