Off Topic What is your interpretation of...............

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
realred1952 said:
this whole fiasco accounts for the whole time you mention ... strange reallly after 5 or 6 years all these things start to become headline news!!


you never seem to be in the majority, but thats fine life needs a minority aspect to point to the fact there is a majority


NO ONE OTHER THAN THAN THOSE involved can actually comment on what did or didnt take place .. at the very least NONE of us! can. He made a statement if even the slightest hint he would resign, he did, but didnt say he wouldnt agree with it which he has not and the other side of the story is less reported, WHY ... because its only the bad stuff sells media ... well take time to read the report.. if you have you dont fully understand some of the context especially the summing up ...
Click to expand...
I’ll digest the rest of your answer and reply later. In regards to never seeming to in the majority I’d again respectfully disagree, on here I’m in the minority, but I would suggest not in the wider society. Certainly in relation to Raab, most people would think he had to go. The report obviously says so or he wouldn’t have gone and they’ve seen all the evidence which neither you or I have.

In relation to bullying at work, you’ve been retired for many years, I still work in an office environment and I can assure you management wouldn’t be able to get away with the type of behaviour he admits to. Times have changed. Thankfully. Also in any other work environment he would have been suspended whilst the investigation took place.
 
Redprintt said:
R&W
This is the 3rd time I've asked you to explain your theory.
Or have you changed your mind ?
Click to expand...
Sorry RP I’ve been at a family wedding all day.
I meant that when the boss has his own agenda (like promoting a family member) then there is nothing you can do about it - and if you ‘fall out’ with the prodigal ‘person’ then it will always be your fault. Family always close ranks on the outsiders.
That’s what I meant by there being a link.
 
'I meant that when the boss has his own agenda (like promoting a family member) then there is nothing you can do about it - and if you ‘fall out’ with the prodigal ‘person’ then it will always be your fault. Family always close ranks on the outsiders'

I understand nepotism.
I fail to see the relevance between nepotism with 'bullying' of civil servants by ministers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back