I have just heard a stoke fan on the radio saying they should of won by 3 goals what game was he watching.he also said we will be lucky to stay up

They should have scored 3 but guess what, ya didn't. There was a particularly impressive period where Stoke seemed to be going for the "shots off target record"
Couldn't hit a barn door with an inflatable canary...
Indeed, Beef. Shocking display of attempted finishing in the second half. Stoke would struggle to score against my lot on that evidence. Well…any more than three anyway.
How two officials managed to see that foul as inside the penalty area is beyond me, though the same can be said for why Holt didn’t get yellows for any of his four outrageous dives in the first half – tried to get Woodgate sent off twice. Only to be expected from such a piece of worthless scum. Plus the penalty-attempt dive in the second minute by the bloke who later won the free kick that you scored from (an Olympic standard dive over Woodgate). Plus the foul on Stoke defenders that allowed your on-loan bloke to score.
Apart from that, until you went down to ten men you played some good stuff. Why you insist with this cheating and diving and haranguing refs I really don’t know. You seem good enough to get by without it. As the season wears on, this stuff will get noticed.
Talking of which, I haven’t seen the penalty given to Wigan, but if the ref gave a penalty, why wasn’t it a red? As it was there was no card at all! Odd, because last season Holt only had to fall over in the centre circle and the idiot ref would wave a red at the nearest opposition player, with any number of covering defenders on clear display.


They should have scored 3 but guess what, ya didn't. There was a particularly impressive period where Stoke seemed to be going for the "shots off target record"
Couldn't hit a barn door with an inflatable canary...