Don't argue with Schofield, he's got his (cub) scouting badges and everything. He's not a wum either....
With the exception of the Tottenham game, Liverpool have been the better side in just about all of their games thise season. unfortuntaely a combination of not being clinical enough in front of goal, bad luck, (woodwork), amazing keeping and ****e reffing has meant that we havent managed to earn the results our performances have deserved....Simple as... There is no need to change a team that is developing well. Add to fair enough, but no need to change........... And a message for the OP.......Ive been enjoying this site because the childish WUMs we used to get on 606 seem to be lacking....Please dont make me change my opinion, by posting like a knob
No, you will be paying them £25M ish each over 5 and half years, as in fact you will with the fees, the fact remains, LFC gambled £100M+ on two Strikers, and it has not paid off, may do, may not. The OP asked, to paraphrase, why you aren't challenging, and how you can, my answer, buy some more strikers of sufficient quality.
If you want to start adding wages into the equation then perhaps you should also consider the income that each of them generate for the club and deduct that from your 100M. As for not paying-off then you also have to consider that the season is not even halfway through, the whole squad has improved and we are due for a change of fortune in front of goal. Now do us all a favour and bugger-off!!!
agreed which is why the guy is on my ignore list.... the point i see in dave's quote is ok, stikers need to score more goals but to lump everyhting in as costs and to ignore benefits... like suarez selling as many shirts as torres ever did is just playing one side of the arguement to support your point and ignoring the obvious.
I think its safe to assume that you "hear" lots of things, now why dont you listen to all those little voices in your head and end it all.
