Mweh, talk about Suarez other than as a statement that we played geared to getting the best out of him last year and are looking for a way to play without him is pointless. He's gone.
It would have had no effect on results so far as he wouldn't have been allowed in the training ground yet never mind not playing if he'd stayed with us so his "leadership" (if missing fully a third of your time at work is seen as leadership), would have been irrelevant. Bleating about the girlfriend that left you, that tried to leave you the entire length of the relationship is pointless and wallowing.
BR is playing a very difficult game IMO. It's a knife edge. How long does he persist with Gerrard before the misty nostalgia is removed from enough supporters eyes to accept a team without Gerrard. Gerrard has no intention of retiring this year so BR has to engineer his removal. Anyone saying they'd have not gone off on one of Gerrard hadn't started the season and we lost a few is dubious.... (To be fair there are one or two who could)
Best way he seems to believe is to buy all these players play them all in variations and systems to cover all our "what ifs" until enough of us accept you can't have an immobile midfield and expect to win or even compete at the top end of the PL. And no matter how you play or who else you play, that midfield will always be immobile with Gerrard in it.
I mean there's still enough debate about "****",New signings, etc etc to suggest we are not at that stage yet. Were any of our signings world class? No. Were they all to a man better than they've shown for us so far? Yes.
The risks of BR's strategy are that he will go too far making his point before putting in the midfield he actually wants....we still lose a few afterwards and it's too late, he gets the sack. He's also seen that injury can delay the change even if he thinks it's time (no evidence he does yet)
The other risk is that you disillusion your youngest talent before you get your way. There are signs of that with Hendo, Sterling, Coutinho and Sakho so far this season.
I mean if the plank of wood you have to run twice as hard to make up for earns three times your wages wil you keep it up indefinitely? Yes we can all point to his career and say he deserves it but look at your own work: would you accept the justification that "he was once great at his job" as a valid reason for being told to do his work as well as your own? For taking the flack for bad results when you ran yourself into the ground and he trotted about the place and then gets to say "WE didn't care enough" or "WE didn't work hard enough"?
It would have had no effect on results so far as he wouldn't have been allowed in the training ground yet never mind not playing if he'd stayed with us so his "leadership" (if missing fully a third of your time at work is seen as leadership), would have been irrelevant. Bleating about the girlfriend that left you, that tried to leave you the entire length of the relationship is pointless and wallowing.
BR is playing a very difficult game IMO. It's a knife edge. How long does he persist with Gerrard before the misty nostalgia is removed from enough supporters eyes to accept a team without Gerrard. Gerrard has no intention of retiring this year so BR has to engineer his removal. Anyone saying they'd have not gone off on one of Gerrard hadn't started the season and we lost a few is dubious.... (To be fair there are one or two who could)
Best way he seems to believe is to buy all these players play them all in variations and systems to cover all our "what ifs" until enough of us accept you can't have an immobile midfield and expect to win or even compete at the top end of the PL. And no matter how you play or who else you play, that midfield will always be immobile with Gerrard in it.
I mean there's still enough debate about "****",New signings, etc etc to suggest we are not at that stage yet. Were any of our signings world class? No. Were they all to a man better than they've shown for us so far? Yes.
The risks of BR's strategy are that he will go too far making his point before putting in the midfield he actually wants....we still lose a few afterwards and it's too late, he gets the sack. He's also seen that injury can delay the change even if he thinks it's time (no evidence he does yet)
The other risk is that you disillusion your youngest talent before you get your way. There are signs of that with Hendo, Sterling, Coutinho and Sakho so far this season.
I mean if the plank of wood you have to run twice as hard to make up for earns three times your wages wil you keep it up indefinitely? Yes we can all point to his career and say he deserves it but look at your own work: would you accept the justification that "he was once great at his job" as a valid reason for being told to do his work as well as your own? For taking the flack for bad results when you ran yourself into the ground and he trotted about the place and then gets to say "WE didn't care enough" or "WE didn't work hard enough"?
