Not sure who you mean? But I think raw is spot on and I don't disagree with anything advocaat did today! Consider he's had the team 4 days and he sees them in training. Gomez I maybe wouldn't have played but he did ok. Better than he did under Gus that's for certain.
So iam a mag now LOL what next mrmoonman? Sorry for being honest about my team but we are hopeless sorry. The worst in the league.
Was lucky enough to watch the whole thing. MotD highlights showed us in a poor light. The team worked hard, The fitness is poor. Fletch was poor. It was a foul on Larsson. However, Rodwell lost his player and he scored - Rodders gave the ball away a lot. Enough hope for me there that if he gets Catts back and Catts remains out of trouble plus introduces Watmore or some pace into the side we will be OK on the basis that we'll win a couple through Defoes class AND that the bottom three are awful as well. Dick's decision for Graham on as a sub was ludicrous.
I'd have Catts in for Gomez and that'd be it. I think that team would be quite good. Rodwell I thought looked decent. If you don't pass a ball you can't give it away. At least he's trying. I saw promise. They say about the pen on Nolan (yes it probably was) but at every corner it happened at both ends. And we have had at least 4 stonewallers turned down this season so we have to be due a break with that but, unlike when we should get them, it evens up in the same game. Re the Catts thing. If Catts was in Songs shirt yesterday he'd have been booked 4 times at least. How on earth he was still on the field I have no idea. I counted at least 10 fouls and most of them as bad as Wickhams yellow card!
He is our captain and leader on the pitch, yes the goal should have been ruled out, but JOS is and has been our Achilles heel for three or four seasons, he is one of the common denominators in the demise of a string of managers, all who have failed to identify the problem or have been lulled into thinking the problems lie elsewhere.
Who are you again? My comment is spot on and if you disagree then you haven't got a clue. We'll most on here are clueless tho LOL
Sharp and witty as always!! It takes a real idiot to sit and call everyone names then not even realise when people are having a light hearted comment about them! But you are a special kind of idiot
"we'll most?" what the **** does that mean? your post quality continues to get 'worser'. the clueless keyboard warrior. he's so tough and scary, he types like a pirate. or is worzel gummidge in disguise.
It's funny how the day after every match, the match thread is killed by a meathead gobshite who can't string a sentence together. The thread at this time should be a time to reflect and debate the match, not having it ruined at full time by an angry abusive tosser who lacks the intelligence to handle his emotions.
Boss upbeat despite defeat Published: 21 March, 2015 by Stuart Vose New head coach's verdict on first game in charge. Dick Advocaat was upbeat despite Sunderland's late defeat at West Ham. Diafra Sakho's last-gasp winner saw the hosts take all three points just when it looked as if the Black Cats would secure a share of the spoils. Reflecting on his first game in charge, the Dutchman told SAFSEE: “For me the players did very well today; I thought they worked their socks off. “We looked better and we’ve still got some players to come back into the squad. “Tactically I thought we did well, as we didn’t give many chances away to a team that are very difficult to play against. “We went close [to taking something from the game], but obviously not close enough.” Advocaat felt Seb Larsson was fouled before the ball was worked to Sahko, who fired the winner inside the far post. Meanwhile, Jermain Defoe had Sunderland's best chance – firing wide when clean through in the first half. “I do think it was a foul in the build up to their goal; we know these things happen all season but for us right now that was not a good moment. “Jermain had a great chance early in the game, if he had scored that it would have been completely different, West Ham would have had to come at us a lot more.”
He is definitely Worzel, with his turnip heed on back to front. His lustfull moments are spent pandering after a doll called Sally, which is about as wooden as he can get.
Been prove right most of the time. not like plums like you tho. How people call me clueless is ****ing laughable.
