Wenger Brigade, what were you saying?

Fail. That's not how reading works. You READ something (like a book or in your case something intellectual like Nuts magazine) then based on that experience you decide wether you like something or not.


There's nothing constructive about this article at all. It's just WUMMING and in most forums that gets you banned.

 

Thanks for the constructive contribution, Jayram will be proud

 

..

 

You saw what the thread was about and chose to read the comments within. so like I said ... if you didn't like the thread (which by basic reading comprehension you could've worked out from the thread's title), you shouldn't have READ IT

Try again smarty pants, next time try harder.

And for SupaMcGooner, you are tarred with the same brush. Laughing and agreeing with an idiotic comment makes you .. well .. idiotic really !

 

I think you need to have a little lay down in a darkened room

 

Wow.. The burn. You really showed me with your witty and insightful response.

I still dont think you understand how this works. I'm going to read the article and some (or all) of the comments and base my opinion on that. Which I did. Not make blanket assumptions based on the 'thread's title'.

 

The OP posted this thread to ask the question what the Wenger Knows group thought. Get over it. The Op has taken an almighty amount of **** because of his views.

 

So what did you learn from the thread?

Do you think your comments in any way enlivened it or made it better in any way?

By the way to have got into reading comments, the OP's post must have held some interest for you - otherwise why bother????

 

Do you want me to sugar coat stuff for you in the future?

Talking of tact - how was your post tactful? Are any of your posts tactful when addressing me?

Stop being a hypocrite.

 

This is going nowhere.