My initial thought on first view was that he was out of order. These fans help pay your salary.
Then I thought of the way the fanbase has behaved toward the club over the last 8 months or so and thought that it was fair game.
There needs to be some kind of clear the air talks between the board and fans as a divided club will only go one way. The way the crowd were from 2-3 really turned the game. Bournemouth **** themselves as the sheer noise around the ground gave the Leeds players an extra yard of pace to will the ball in to the net. We need that every game and not this booing ****e at half time.
I'm all for freedom of speech and i get the argument that if you pay for something you can complain if you don't think you got value.... etc etc. I also get the heat of the moment rant at bad play, but... I'm really against booing any player, manager or the board. What does it achieve? There are those that say the fans can let the board know that they've had enough of a manager or enough of them and this will hasten a decision. Maybe it will, sometimes it does. But generally they're going to work that out themselves from the league table. In most cases it just creates a negative environment that increases stress levels on the performance of the team. If you're going to the ground, cheer the fckers on no matter how they're playing. That's the best way of impacting things. Look how that second half atmosphere drove them on. Vent your spleen in the pub or on forums like this afterwards if you need to.
Last edited:

but I thought I would cover my bases while you were mothering him