Wee rat face .........
- Thread starter A.L.D.O 4.1
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
If yer willing to take a word from me, the word is the guy is an arsehole and no **** wants him here.
Better than being a sad auld **** who is obsessed with a dead football team and even more obsessed with the goings on at their former rivals.
Better than being a sad auld **** who is obsessed with a dead football team and even more obsessed with the goings on at their former rivals.
That pretty much describes yourself, apart from possibly the auld part. Replace that with deformed and it is you.
Prove it? Mick told us who posted the tag, Chapper as far as I know has not denied posting it, he has however tried to suggest that the context has been lost somewhere, so maybe you should ask him which context he posted it in?
Other people have read the thread where it happened, it's clear to them what exactly went on, but if you want to take that scummy ****'s word over mine, Gambol's and many others then that's your perogative
Prove it? Mick told us who posted the tag, Chapper as far as I know has not denied posting it, he has however tried to suggest that the context has been lost somewhere, so maybe you should ask him which context he posted it in?
Other people have read the thread where it happened, it's clear to them what exactly went on, but if you want to take that scummy ****'s word over mine, Gambol's and many others then that's your perogative
Och bit you are ignoring the context the tag was made in and failing to take into consideration the complete f**kwittery of the tager in question .
When all these vagaries are manifest in ones final analysis then the obvious conclusion must ultimately be......
Chappers an ignorant **** .
It's a scientific fact .
Aye because I'm always posting ***** threads about Rangers shamelessly stolen from other sites.
How about you actually say something for a change instead of leeching onto other people and making snidey ****ebag remarks....
Och bit you are ignoring the context the tag was made in and failing to take into consideration the complete f**kwittery of the tager in question .
When all these vagaries are manifest in ones final analysis then the obvious conclusion must ultimately be......
Chappers an ignorant **** .
It's a scientific fact .
Nicely put.
Prove it? Mick told us who posted the tag, Chapper as far as I know has not denied posting it, he has however tried to suggest that the context has been lost somewhere, so maybe you should ask him which context he posted it in?
Other people have read the thread where it happened, it's clear to them what exactly went on, but if you want to take that scummy ****'s word over mine, Gambol's and many others then that's your perogative
If Mick knows for certain it was him then why wasn't he banned for life ?
And i'm not taking anyone's word over anyone elses.
I'm not here to judge, but if he did write those things then he has no place on here.
Chapper ?
Because no one asked for him to be banned, he was sent to Coventry by some of us and we thought he would not have the ****ing gall to show his face back here.... we should have known better.
He posted it, he knew what he was doing and anything he says to the contrary is a lie. Scum is as scum does and the fact that he has refused to acknowledege any fault on his part is evidence in itself of his scumminess.
He did write those things, he has no place on here, but he keeps popping up like an unflushed turd because some people are responding to his posts.
I have him on ignore but people keep quoting the sick twisted **** so I can't avoid reading his pish.
You're pretty much the Frankie Boyle of the forum. Try to post the most shocking things for a laugh, but in reality you are just an unfunny ginger ****.
Good man
This a forum populated by ****s. It's why we like it.
We give it hard and take it hard. If ye canny take it as much as ye give it you shouldn't be here.
However, that does not mean there aren't limits. My limit is using information about a personal tragedy for simple point scoring. That goes beyond any reasonable person's pale.
I still don't understand why chapper hasn't been banned.
Couldn't agree more pal.
I said at the time he should be blanked by all as a way of letting him know it was totally unacceptable.
It has been good to see the way the decent bears on here have dealt with it.
I know it's difficult to know where the boundaries are sometimes, but surely to **** you would accept you had crossed a line after saying something like that?? I would have called him out in a very public way, the ****ing rat bag.
