We cannot lose agger
- Thread starter Bumps
- Start date
Then sod them. Make it a punitive price tag. We don't need to sell so it's how much they want to buy. And put a very short deadline on it so we have time to accommodate replacements.
So: £35 million, one week to decide.
Aw diddums has the bigger boys come to poach one of your players?
Maybe if your manager hadn`t broken a gentleman`s agreement and gone after a Swansea player you may have got a bit of sympathy.
Maybe if your manager hadn`t broken a gentleman`s agreement and gone after a Swansea player you may have got a bit of sympathy.
Kelly in a year or so but he's not Ageer. Coates not at moment. We cannot afford to sell him unless its a huge sum.
Agger doesnt want to go and we should not be talking about letting him go for any money. He is our best defender and part of the fabric of the club. He is one of the best ball playing cbs going and is perfect for our new style. If we are serious about getting back to the top, we will ensure he stays
If we were to get rid of Pacheco or Suso, I be proper pissed......Are we not supposed to be developing young players? Cant see it.
30m+.
Who the **** cares if he used to get injured all the time? So did RvP and you don't see Arsenal accepting anything less than 30 for him.
He's the glue in the defence. I have said it before and I'll say it again, he's worth twice as much as Skrtel is to us. Agger is class without Skrtel, not the opposite. He's on of the best defenders in the world with the ball and they better give us minimum 15 to replace him + 15 as a **** off tax.
If the owners let Agger leave as well as stifle Suso/Pacheco's first team development, it's going to be Hodgson v2. If this happens it's going to be the classic one step forward (Borini), 6 steps back.
Who the **** cares if he used to get injured all the time? So did RvP and you don't see Arsenal accepting anything less than 30 for him.
He's the glue in the defence. I have said it before and I'll say it again, he's worth twice as much as Skrtel is to us. Agger is class without Skrtel, not the opposite. He's on of the best defenders in the world with the ball and they better give us minimum 15 to replace him + 15 as a **** off tax.
If the owners let Agger leave as well as stifle Suso/Pacheco's first team development, it's going to be Hodgson v2. If this happens it's going to be the classic one step forward (Borini), 6 steps back.
Totally agree with this.
It's about time WE started playing hard ball with these ****ing clubs who are only too keen to flash the cash when it's Everton or Atletico or Wolfsburg etc
Not bothered about that and not crying about that but what really annoys me is when bigger boys pay less than they should, we are not a bigger boy that are having to pay big boy price which is what annoys me considering how all these other clubs fans come on here to tell us how we are not big boys any more but think it fine to keep giving us big boy prices. Also if we not so big why so many other fans on our boards telling us we are delusional grrrr
As i said at the start Agger being sold is not a money thing it is statement of intent. Selling our best defender who we have stood by through the injuries whether ot be for fifteen or twenty is not good. It tells the rest of the team our intention,mthat is what worries me. LFC should be coming out now and stating that he is not for sale at any price as he is integral to our team, simple as
This story has got some serious legs over at RAWK
http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=276162.1920
http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=276162.1920
Stop flattering yourself boyo.
Brendan will get the message off our supporters soon enough that we dont want any of his former clubs players.
Nos da.
Maybe I misunderstood but what have the owners got to do with our youth development?