This post says more about you than me ****s like you make me laugh...behave like a piece of **** 24/7 then when you don't get the response you want since you're a ****ing troll...you blame it on a man's faith Go and rim some Ladyboy...that's your calling in life...maybe if you rim them enough they might evolve into a woman and you can prove your theory of evolution right
Come off it HIAG. If you chose to be a denier then crack on, but don’t try and portray creationism as having equivalence in terms of evidence based fact.
You want to look at the Lloyd Pye lecture on YouTube. It is a fairly accessible summary of the position adopted by those who do not subscribe the Darwinian theory. There are more technical arguments, but I don’t have the time to go into them, here. Everything you’ve been told is a lie, Tobias.
A bloke who had no scientific background whatsoever and who claimed to have a skull that ‘proved’ the existence of an alien- human hybrid. Despite the skull being shown to have human DNA. Well done for completely proving my earlier point about ridiculous false equivalence.
It’s patently clear that Leslie pertains to follow the fantasy view regarding science as an attention seeking tool which is exactly what he is.
Instead of looking at all the evidence and forming a stance based on it, a lot of people choose a stance and then go looking for anything they can find to support it, no matter how incredulous.
I don't regard theories as evidence. How many times have you been told one thing to be only told another years later because scientists have found something else out? It's happened a few times in my life if memory serves me correct. Scientists are Gods for some people. Gods are God's for others.
The thing with science is that it's constantly evolving, so naturally theories change and adapt as we understand more. But it's the basic scientific principle that interests me, that we attempt to understand our universe through tried and tested methods, rather than guessing. So the best theories are reached by the best minds agreeing on a principle because they have tested and tried to disprove it, it's not 100% fact, but it's the best attempt at explaining the truth as we understand it.
Sorry but this is nonsense Scientists are the epitome of making this game fit their theories The problem today, and granted there will be exceptions, is people passing the likes of Dawkins as scientists who are in no way biased. He sells books. Even proper athiests laugh at him but he is the genius of laymen I had one guy quite Ricky Gervais once I know it's not everyone's cup of tea but things like fossil records and evolution as the layman argues it is not necessarily what scientists believe. I would say that in academia today Darwinism is dead but it hasn't filtered down to the masses
What is nonsense exactly ? If a scientific paradigm doesn't fit what can be observed or measured then it's thrown out. If it stays in then it's either an experimental theory or in the realms of pseudo science.
I'm a Muslim mate. I say this because usually this leads to my views eung "biased" or "you're bound to say that" etc. Not you but generally But I like to think I reached here by going through various other "religions" even if it was a discussion
It depends on how advanced the lifeform is, It think they'd be happy to admit anything upto an ape, but on par or better than us, nah.
The argument is nonsense. Because this isn't science in practice. For example all darwinians believe themselves to be evolutionary biologists but not all evolutionary biologists are darwinists. The evolutionary theory as discussed is usually darwinism and even Darwin had tests in place that fail but it's still pushed
