yeah,has to be one of these 2 options,I mean Snodgrass is admitting that he was injured at the end of last season but basically played through it.
Didn't he play full Europa games before that QPR game? So it's not as if it's Bullard-esque where his first game for us he broke down because we failed to pick something up on a medical.
City knew Bullard was injured when he was signed,in the case of Snodgrass,he has pretty much admitted that he was carrying an injury when he joined.Any medical should have picked up his cartledge issue.
He played against Trencin at KC im sure - also i assume our medical team would have access to any medical reports covering his time at Norwich
I've been ambivalent about this since it happened. I know **** happens but at the time the tackle looked pretty innocuous and my immediate thought on hearing the length of the layoff was that there must have been an underlying issue there in the first place. I really hope that he comes back strong for us and is effectively like a new signing next season, but at the moment I'm afraid that he is most certainly in my file of Bullardesk players.
More jobs, especially well paid jobs that include medical insurance, ask you to complete a questionnaire about known conditions or irregular symptoms and I would have expected Snodgrass and the Norwich management team to have declared the content of that interview. If they did not then Hull City, or their insurers are bound to follow up on it.