True dat. Apparently taking a 15 year old girl against her family's wishes doesn't constitute kidnapping. Maybe someone on here could give it a try. Gambol?
"...Two months later, Paisley publicly played a tape-recording of Maura Lyons describing her conversion. He was laconic with the truth: the tape, he said, had been found among milk bottles on his doorstep. He also showed his talent for playing the beleaguered hero. 'If I knew where the girl was I would not take her to the police,..." Covering for child abducters leads to covering for child abusers
Helping a teenager escape her vicious parents. Na, I wouldn't say that's kidnapping. You obviously have stumbled across this and your eyes have lit up thinking you have unraveled something. You haven't. It was against the law for homosexuals to look after kids in this capacity. Valerie Shaw had told Paisley that, not that the kids were being sexually abused. If that was the case then Valerie Shaw and Ian Paisley would have been jailed for failing to report the matter. They weren't.
He refused to tell the police where she was - then played a tape of her "voice" to his mad sect-members (after he claimed he didn't know where she was) - the judge gave him an early version of a restriction order - Paisley wasn't allowed to meet or be near her. Her family still claim that the propaganda tape wasn't their daughter's voice. In a list of bad things he's done, it's at the bottom and almost inconsequential.
No, but I'm quite confident half of you are just having a go because Paisley was involved (Not you specifically, See mindy post #whatever). So I thought I'd jump on the bandwagon and call all Vatican lovers kidnapper sympathizers. Right?
There isn't one. It's a Medro thread. Paisley definitely beasted kids. You can tell just by looking at him. Case closed.
