VAR is garbage

Well I hate to say I told you so, but I did. Aside from goal line technology which is quick/efficient, the rest of this malarkey just needs ditched. Last season it was "patience, give it a chance to bed in". Well I've tried that, turns out its getting worse and is utter ****.

This was so ****ing obvious if you watch other sports like rugby, cricket, tennis who are able to use it. The reason it works for them is exactly the reason its a complete failure in football. Football isn't as black and white, there are several moving parts in any particular moment. So you're still a sucker to human error. The only difference is you now get a big delay, and you also remove a massive portion of passion for the game. Absolute enjoyment killer.

No excuses now, get rid. Its not necessary. All we need is to respect officials and their decisions. Accept the rough with the smooth as we have for over 100 successful years. The boffins got their day in the sun and got burnt to a crisp. **** VAR. Absolute farce. People never worked out, its still a human decision and therefore subject to the same human error. It improves very marginally because you have time, but there are still mistakes. Are the delays/downside worth the reward? Absolutely not.
Happy to see it go. It was an interesting experiment but it hasn’t added anything to the game and just disrupts the flow. Suspect they could save a fair bit of money by binning it off so may as well.
 
I'd not be sad if we binned it completely. If it has to stay, then it needs to go down the route of other sports like cricket: the original on field decision stands in the event of any doubt. If there is a clear and obvious error it is overturned. If the referee has to jog over to a pitchside monitor it is not clear and obvious.

I don't think review system (e.g. you have two reviews a game each side, if they are unsuccessful you lose them) would work in football. The game turns too much on individual decisions and it is not clear cut enough to make it partisan.
 
Happy to see it go. It was an interesting experiment but it hasn’t added anything to the game and just disrupts the flow. Suspect they could save a fair bit of money by binning it off so may as well.

I must admit despite my misgivings about the whole thing, I think you could still argue it was a worthwhile exercise at the time. How do you know unless you give it a go. I'm fine with that as long as when it fails as this has, you are big enough to admit it and just accept it as an unmitigated disaster.
 
  • Like
Reactions: magpie290761
I must admit despite my misgivings about the whole thing, I think you could still argue it was a worthwhile exercise at the time. How do you know unless you give it a go. I'm fine with that as long as when it fails as this has, you are big enough to admit it and just accept it as an unmitigated disaster.
No technology.

It all needs to **** off
 
I'd not be sad if we binned it completely. If it has to stay, then it needs to go down the route of other sports like cricket: the original on field decision stands in the event of any doubt. If there is a clear and obvious error it is overturned. If the referee has to jog over to a pitchside monitor it is not clear and obvious.

I don't think review system (e.g. you have two reviews a game each side, if they are unsuccessful you lose them) would work in football. The game turns too much on individual decisions and it is not clear cut enough to make it partisan.

If they go down that route then the game is dead. I don't even think they are that stupid.
 
Interesting now var isn't intervening.

Seems a few people can't complain really
 
I agree with shearer. VAR isn’t the problem it’s the people operating it that is.

VAR offsides should be scraped. That’s just my opinion. Because it can be manipulated.

VAR penalty incidents have to stay and has to improve. Rather than the referee call the penalty. He should call the VAR to assess. Then the “right” people should make the call for the penalty based on the facts and the rules. Similarly with a pen call when the player cheats.

It should be easy for 3 people to call a decision. Not 1. But three and they need to give reasons and be accountable. If you had 3 people calling it then it’s always going to hr a majority.
 
  • Like
Reactions: magpie290761
I agree with shearer. VAR isn’t the problem it’s the people operating it that is.

VAR offsides should be scraped. That’s just my opinion. Because it can be manipulated.

VAR penalty incidents have to stay and has to improve. Rather than the referee call the penalty. He should call the VAR to assess. Then the “right” people should make the call for the penalty based on the facts and the rules. Similarly with a pen call when the player cheats.

It should be easy for 3 people to call a decision. Not 1. But three and they need to give reasons and be accountable. If you had 3 people calling it then it’s always going to hr a majority.

How many ex-footballers are sat at home doing absolutely nothing. I'm not even talking PL - you've got lads down at Conference level who at least understand the game as it's played - anyone seriously telling me you can't find three ex-pro's to login centrally from home and "vote" on an incident? Anything carrying two votes is upheld. You would have to include offsides but only review if it's clear - if you're drawing lines then it doesn't count. Penalty incidents, checks for red cards.

Get rid of the other nonsense, like fouls in build up and stuff, that happens.

But if player is clearly offside after scoring, linesman flag is down, review and rule out.
All penalties should be referred - because the game is stopped anyway.
Red card review - the same - quick check, no card/yellow/red, move on.

It's not difficult, you just have typical corporate ****ers in charge who always find a way to over-complicate and ultimately **** up everything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Geordie Ginola
Or we could simply turn it around.

If one team contests a decision then they have 2 appeals each half to ask for VAR to be involved. It would happen the next time the ball goes out of play. If appeal is successful then you retain it but if wrong you lose it a la cricket.

It would be restricted to

1. Sending off or not.
2. Penalty or not.
3. Goal or not eg foul on defender, offside etc.

The decision would be was the earlier decision right or not. If it was appeal fails. If it wasn't then appeal succeeds. No discussing "clear and obvious error". If down to subjective opinion eg was it a foul or not then referee required to watch monitor and re-decide.

Also referees discussions to VAR officials to be open and public. Also referees required to be interviewed after game (higher echelons etc not Sunday League football) to explain decisions.

Then VAR would work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roland Deschain
Or we could simply turn it around.

If one team contests a decision then they have 2 appeals each half to ask for VAR to be involved. It would happen the next time the ball goes out of play. If appeal is successful then you retain it but if wrong you lose it a la cricket.

It would be restricted to

1. Sending off or not.
2. Penalty or not.
3. Goal or not eg foul on defender, offside etc.

The decision would be was the earlier decision right or not. If it was appeal fails. If it wasn't then appeal succeeds. No discussing "clear and obvious error". If down to subjective opinion eg was it a foul or not then referee required to watch monitor and re-decide.

Also referees discussions to VAR officials to be open and public. Also referees required to be interviewed after game (higher echelons etc not Sunday League football) to explain decisions.

Then VAR would work.
I’m not sure what the answer is. I like this idea but it would be abused in some way I would imagine.

And it sounds Americanised.