Bin Ladin was 1 man and the Afghani's didnt give him up as per the Yanks requests. Although they had no known or legal reason to do so Wander what would happen if the Taliban asked for the Yanks to hand over this soldier who committed a terrorist act on their home soil and would an attack on US soil now be legal?
Hmm oh i dunno maybe about "soldiers" killing innocent people? IRA never done that did they? And before you accuse me of sticking up for this american i actually think the afghans should deal with him I'm only pointing out holes in your clearly one sided logic. Be quiet you.
At the very same time, the UK had a visitor, a friend, named General Augustus Pinochet. The Spanish wanted him so they could put him on trial for crimes against humanity in Chile Britain refused to hand him over Where was the Spanish Armada that was morally right to invade the UK then....
What holes have you pointed out in my logic? You done nothing of the sort. You simply slapped your keyboard in a fit of tourettes which has been your forte of late. What the **** has an American soldier murdering 16 people in Afghanistan got to do with the IRA you ******?
What has one american soldier got to do with all the foreign forces in afghanistan? absolutely **** all. You put the point across that because hes representing the US army he murdered them in the name of the US army just because they trained him. Based on those insane ramblings one could say bobby sands slapped ****e on the walls in the name of the IRA because they trained him.
It doesn't matter what's posted but you can almost gurantee that your thread will turn into an anti british or irish politics squabble soon enough! "I like tea with milk - no sugar" "Irish milks the best in your tea" "No it's not" "Your milk's irish Medro" "No, it isn't - it's Britsh" "Norther Ireland is ireland" "it's british"
