underage sex

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
you obviously missed the bit where i explained to you that this was an INTERNET FORUM

had this been english 101 I would have been grammatically correct

by the way schoolish is a word

schoolish (adj.)

↘educationally, scholastically

schoolish (adj.)

scholastic, school


The picture looks schoolish as in it could be a school picture

You did say 'looks like schoolish'...

Expect some grief <ok>
 
You did say 'looks like schoolish'...

Expect some grief <ok>

toby i agree looks like schoolish is grammatically incorrect, as i say its an internet forum and usually the highlighting of spelling, grammar or sentence structure being incorrect is the bastian of the internet warrior who has been verbally slapped off his swivel chair

TBF the jordan bloke only highlighted schoolish, obviously not recognising it as an actual word
 
toby i agree looks like schoolish is grammatically incorrect, as i say its an internet forum and usually the highlighting of spelling, grammar or sentence structure being incorrect is the bastian of the internet warrior who has been verbally slapped off his swivel chair

TBF the jordan bloke only highlighted schoolish, obviously not recognising it as an actual word

No, if it's coming from someone who claims to have been a teacher then you will get mocked.

My only grief is why someone of your age is out in the streets chasing underage girls. Each to their own though <ok>
 
This thread has sadly gone from being an interesting read to another sorry argument over GRAMMAR. <doh>

Not really but I can understand why you would come to that conclusion. What we really have is a Walter Mitty-type claiming to have been a teacher, posting a thread about possibly having sex with a 15 year old and then proceeding to show on a post by post basis that if he was a teacher (and no one's buying it) then it says a helluva lot about how easy it must be to get through FOUR YEARS of a TEACHING degree when he can barely string a few words together.

The problem with the thread is not the content. It's the worrying aspect of what the OP is getting out of such a debate.
 
toby over 16 isnt 'underage' you do know that right? nit saying its your cup of tea, just saying

BB its ST - ruined another one

ST - ditto
 
Not really but I can understand why you would come to that conclusion. What we really have is a Walter Mitty-type claiming to have been a teacher, posting a thread about possibly having sex with a 15 year old and then proceeding to show on a post by post basis that if he was a teacher (and no one's buying it) then it says a helluva lot about how easy it must be to get through FOUR YEARS of a TEACHING degree when he can barely string a few words together.

The problem with the thread is not the content. It's the worrying aspect of what the OP is getting out of such a debate.

A reply to a post from me and no abuse???
No acting like a twat???


HIJACK ALERT!!!!! <yikes>
 
Not really but I can understand why you would come to that conclusion. What we really have is a Walter Mitty-type claiming to have been a teacher, posting a thread about possibly having sex with a 15 year old and then proceeding to show on a post by post basis that if he was a teacher (and no one's buying it) then it says a helluva lot about how easy it must be to get through FOUR YEARS of a TEACHING degree when he can barely string a few words together.

The problem with the thread is not the content. It's the worrying aspect of what the OP is getting out of such a debate.

says the man continuing to comment

how do you know anyone is who they say they are on here?

and it doesnt matter if i am grammatically incorrect as you cant ****ing read anyway

The thread was more about the fairness of a bloke getting into grief over believing the girl he had pulled was underage

My example was one of finding out and NOT going through with something

As for th eno one buying - no one is buying your not a prick but you keep attempting denials
 
what ?????

In this country having sex with a girl over 16 is not classed as underage sex. Its the law ****wit

I'm almost lost for words. I was referring to the fact that you claimed to be a teacher but you show no evidence of being educated to such a standard. The fact that you didn't understand that is merely another example of your stupidity.

Honestly, if I was to hazard a guess I would even go as far to say that English isn't even your first language.