Ulster Rugger

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
gas said:
Word on the street is they admitted their blatant homosexuality and as such the mere thought of sticking their big gay cocks into a vagina would have been repulsive.
Click to expand...

You have stuck your big gay cock into many a repulsive vagina, so I'm told <ok>

While the big gay husband sits in a chair ****ing, moreover.
 
[HASHTAG]#IBelieveHer[/HASHTAG] has become the new [HASHTAG]#MeToo[/HASHTAG] but only with even more ignorance.

A bunch of prejudiced people (the "all men are rapists" types) upset because they didn't get the verdict they wanted. ****ing Guardian columnists writing columns along the lines of Just Because They've Been Found Innocent Doesn't Mean They're Not Guilty ****.

Of course, the same "we want equality!" brigade will be nowhere to be seen the next time an innocent man is sent to prison and then later released when it turns out the accuser lied under oath,
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Toley Fart, gas and Mick O'Toon
Hairy Biscuit said:
[HASHTAG]#IBelieveHer[/HASHTAG] has become the new [HASHTAG]#MeToo[/HASHTAG] but only with even more ignorance.

A bunch of prejudiced people (the "all men are rapists" types) upset because they didn't get the verdict they wanted. ****ing Guardian columnists writing columns along the lines of Just Because They've Been Found Innocent Doesn't Mean They're Not Guilty ****.

Of course, the same "we want equality!" brigade will be nowhere to be seen the next time an innocent man is sent to prison and then later released when it turns the accuser lied under oath,
Click to expand...
Looked at some of the tweets last night,loads calling for the 2 lads never to play rugby for Ulster and Ireland again which I's say will happen.
 
Hairy Biscuit said:
[HASHTAG]#IBelieveHer[/HASHTAG] has become the new [HASHTAG]#MeToo[/HASHTAG] but only with even more ignorance.

A bunch of prejudiced people (the "all men are rapists" types) upset because they didn't get the verdict they wanted. ****ing Guardian columnists writing columns along the lines of Just Because They've Been Found Innocent Doesn't Mean They're Not Guilty ****.

Of course, the same "we want equality!" brigade will be nowhere to be seen the next time an innocent man is sent to prison and then later released when it turns out the accuser lied under oath,
Click to expand...

Correct! It's a ****in' disgrace. These women should be ****in' imprisoned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EDGE.
People are ****ing ******s. Most of them are certain they're guilty yet don't know the basic fact that Belfast courts are under British law.
 
Ciaran said:
People are ****ing ******s. Most of them are certain they're guilty yet don't know the basic fact that Belfast courts are under British law.
Click to expand...
Yeah,a lot of comments about Ireland being a backward country(no giggling at the back),treatment of women etc but there's two different jurisdictions which a lot have failed to grasp,would there be a different decision in Dublin,who knows?Unanimous decision and only took them 4 hours to deliberate.
 
Mick O'Toon said:
Yeah,a lot of comments about Ireland being a backward country(no giggling at the back),treatment of women etc but there's two different jurisdictions which a lot have failed to grasp,would there be a different decision in Dublin,who knows?Unanimous decision and only took them 4 hours to deliberate.
Click to expand...

After evidence from the so called victim's girlfriend they took 4 hours to deliberate?

Were they ****in' sleeping for 3 hours 59 minutes ffs??
 
Hairy Biscuit said:
Apparently it was the evidence of some other burd that swung it. She apparently walked in on them and she told the jury the alleged victim looked like she was enjoying herself. They even asked her if she wanted to join in but she declined. The reason, apparently, that the 'victim' cried rape was because she thought that someone had photographed her enjoying her romp and was worried they were going to leak the photos online.

Imagine being put through all that because some bint was embarrassed her tits and minge might end up on the internet.
Click to expand...

She didn't say anything of the sort.

"Before concluding her evidence, Ms Florence was again re-examined by prosecution barrister Mr Hedworth QC about the actions of the complainant.
He said: “Apart from turning her head, were there any actions?”
Ms Florence said: “No.”
The lawyer then said: “Were there any signs that (the complainant) was positively consenting?”
The woman said: “No.”
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back