He doesn't, Lincoln - he's just spewing rubbish as usual. No-one knows, as it was no doubt made a condition of the termination of his contract.
I think it is unreasonable to assume the singing of a popular song signifies support for CTWD.It is a form of hijacking. Please come up with a song we do not at presently sing.Please not a chant such as "ere we go,ere we go..." An actual song we do not sing which is made very clear the singing of it supports CTWD.I can then support the team without supporting the campaign.Surely there can be no reason for not doing this as it will guage the actual support I think the group will scoff at this idea because they are scared they may be exposed as a small group-regardless of the "reasons"they give for bottling it.
Surely those apathetic about a name change would not have sung it? Ditto the 15 or so pro name change quislings. You can assume all those who sung it knew exactly what they were doing/singing. Ffs man, give up...you're coming across as desperate.
Or maybe because teaching a new song would mean everybody in the Stadium would need to learn it. You can't just have a small group sing a completely new song and expect everyone to join in. We have the enough with some of the 'Ulltra's songs!
You mean they should ban banners which say things like " We Are Hull City " at a Hull City football match ?
Do you have a photo of him touching his ear and talking into his sleeve? Did you actually see him beckon someone over and gesture at the banner? Do you sit next to him and heard him give *the order*? No? You're just making stuff up aren't you?
I'm taking that as a no then. Can see why the CTWD campaign has adopted you as their pet bitch mod. Zero proof, 100% speculation, and yet you call me biased.
There will have been a directive from MR Allam to take action against anyone protesting/showing dissent towards the name change
When did you start caring about evidence? Do you remember these posts from the summer?: In spite of all the evidence offered back then, you were determined to believe that a name change was never happening, or even more ridiculous that it was happening at the decision of someone other than Allam. We both know this is simply because you are a massive Allam fan. At times you seem to be a bigger Allam fan than you are a Hull City fan, although unlike Chazz you haven't explicitly admitted it. This same love for the owner is the source of your bias here. As I keep saying, only someone who really wants to believe it could genuinely think that order was made by anyone other than an embarrassed and angry Assem Allam.
lol you have a folder with my stuff in? I'm flattered. When I posted the first thing, no one knew for certain anything, I was keeping an open mind and not being dragged into the beginnings of the witch hunt you're now a fully paid up member of. My stance then was the name wasn't changing that season, and I was right about that, even then once the name change thing was actually officially announced and not just spoken about online by people who had been proven to make up stuff in the past, I was wrong, can't you find that one in your file?? Nice try and deflecting an explanation too, well I say nice, it's actually rubbish, unless your opening statement means of course you don't have any evidence at all and you're just making stuff up. You could just come out and say that though instead of cherry picking older posts of mine. Yes I am a big Dr Allam fan, if it weren't for him I wouldn't have a club to support. Bigger fan of his than the club? No one is bigger than the club, not even CTWD. He's close though.
Well that's one chant that will die then if MR Allam gets his way, no point in singing "City 'till I Die" if we are Hull Tigers as it will have no connection to the club & will no doubt end with rhetorical chants from opposition fans of "Who are ya?"
Yes they can, they say stick your ****ty minimum wage one day every 2 weeks job up your arse. "Only following orders" has never been a valid defence, and there's nobody paying their mortgage by being a steward. Did you see how many stewards came pouring out of the tunnel to the North Stand concourse (the one in amongst the away fans)? If they normally have 40 or more stewards stood on there during the game I'd be amazed, especially for a game with only about 1k travelling fans who are all in the stand itself. It'll have taken time for them to get their reinforcements into place. No, when the stewards got hold of it fans from the stand went down and pushed them away, got between them and the banner, then blocked the path at the front of the stand as the banner went away so that the stewards couldn't follow. They were **** before the protest, they were **** after it. It'd be hard to justify the claim it affected their performance. If I burgle your house and you catch me at it will you praise me for my actions in leaving before the situation turns nasty? There's 89 other minutes when you can clearly do what you want to do. 19.04 has been chosen as the time for an obvious reason, so if you disagree with it just be quiet for a minute. It's like the national anthem, as an atheist and a republican I'm against the whole message of the song, I don't find maintaining silence during it being played means I'm unable to show support for my side for the rest of the afternoon.
