Truth telling with Chuckles
- Thread starter Bib Fortuna's Maw
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
We are talking about two different things here you spazzy ****wit but seeing as you have seen my bet, I guess that means you accept it. We can talk about the other bet when you get back in a month
http://www.scotprem.com/content/default.asp?page=s109
"To turn a blind eye, to allow clubs to continually fail to make prompt payments as they fall due, would be to allow those clubs to gain an unfair sporting advantage over all those other clubs that pay their players, the taxman and other clubs on time. That is one of the reasons why, whenever the SPL receives a request from players to adjudicate on their contracts, it has a duty to do so."
Neil Doncaster
Chief Executive, Scottish Premier League
Cheerio you dopey *****
You must log in or register to see images
So nothing in there that says rangers are guilty.
It's also a blog, much like RTC was a blog.
What a ****ing lunatic you are.
I think you need to learn the rules of betting, if I raise you you must see my bet, daft ****.
Rangers have not been proven to have cheated, until you show me a statement from the commission saying rangers have cheated, you lose.
By the way I believe you have just forced a 2 chip penalty upon yourself
By the way nice touch on trying to blame me for changing the subject, I've said the same thing over the past 3 pages
This is the worst apology ever.
An awful lot of lip for someone who has been gaped quite so badly.
You're making out the only reason rangers were able to sign any players into new contracts was because they never paid tax. I disagree with that. No advantage gained IMO
So because Rangers could have funded the signing of new players by selling more tickets to ticketus, or indeed have gained massive investment from a Russian oligarch...because that could have happened you are happy to excuse the fact that they did fund these signings and wages using monies withheld from the Tax man.....right you are
Fair point. **** knows what Willis was arguing about. He wont accept a blog from the Chief exucutive of the SFA as evidence in an argument nor the judgement of the panel that Ally McCoist wanted Lynched and Trebor Moonbeams just resolutely resists the facts because of some **** that might have happened in an alternate universe.
Yes, I am absolutely beeling about something that has nothing to do with this.
Rhaging in fact.
I can usually tell when people really are "Beeling", they start with religious/sectarian insults
So becasue Tina "may have" called someone an Orange Bastard or the like, I have no right to criticise MD for calling people "Bead Rattlers" or simillar?
This is a tired ****ing argument in all truth.