It means that obama is very entertaining and could be making a fortune by having his own tv chat show but he probabaly won't as his wife will be next up for political office.
IMO Hillary Clinton will be a single term president and whoever the republicans put up will win the next one. Unless they pick a total trump again. I think michelle obama will need to run for senate or something in chicago and will need 8/10 yeats before she is ready IMO.
Taliban leaders watched U.S. presidential debate, blast 'non-serious' Trump http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world...serious-trump/ar-BBwL0Lm?li=BBoPWjQ&ocid=iehp
He's facing calls to produce his tax returns - this was bound to happen. Like Paul McCartney trying to claim he only had £40m when he was divorcing Heather, when he really had half a billion.
Tax revelations pitch Trump into crisis Donald Trump is reeling under the biggest crisis of his campaign, after the publication of documents suggesting the Republican nominee, who has refused to release his tax returns, may not have paid federal income tax for nearly two decades. In a challenge to his claim to be a successful businessman and champion of America’s middle class, tax return details leaked to the New York Times reveal that Trump claimed a $916m loss in a 1995 personal filing – enough to legally shelter hundreds of millions from subsequent years of federal tax. The Clinton campaign called the news a “bombshell”. Plus: some Republican women are unfazed by Trump’s sexism; some rural Democratic strongholds are turning Republican; and Ronald Reagan v Bill Clinton is the essential economic battle of the election
Basically its fine to be racists in the USA but if you don't pay tax the same white voters who like you abusing minorities will turn on you cos they can't avoid tax. however... if you manage to declare a loss like that, through acquisition or whatever means it comes, then it is not at all uncommon that a corporation will write it down over time and pay no tax. I had it on good authority my own company paid no tax her for 10 years or more after such an acquisition. There is nothing illegal in this. It is how it is perceived.
what i mean is this: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...-morning-briefing_b-morning-briefing_c-US_d-1 the article basically circles back to a political elite back slapping. Christie calls trump a genius for paying no tax. this shows a complete out of touch player in the game. You cannot boast about shafting the system so the little guy has to pay all the tax and be popular and get votes of the masses. thats the same the world over. you can't go after apple for not paying tax then say it was ok though for me not to pay tax and so forth and so on. given the only comeback has become "the emails" I think this will be a fun one in the next debate which i think is tomorrow night! I expect this one to be much more personal. and if it is hillary can win just by taking the high ground at each point and just fact checking the guy. she will lose if she gets in the sewer with him. He must score a big point on her and the amin one is the emails.
Regarding Republican women unconcerned about sexism: I've actually noticed that some women (usually older) are more sexist against women than almost any man.
Probably true. I really don't think over 40s type women would give a toss about trumps attitudes but certainly over 50s for sure. they will care far more about Hillary not being able to keep her man. I would say <40 thats where he starts to lose them but **** it how many will vote and where... its only the key states that matter. some are just plain republican and women there can either like it or lump it really. is that right or at least a reasonable external assessment?
Except she's been smart in the first debate by owning the email issue and apologising. Any further mention in the last two debates I'm betting she'll say the fbi has closed it, the Senate has gone as far as it can and reference her apology. She'll then compare her apology to Trump's boasts of his "errors" and how he actually sees them as triumphs. If she's very smart (or her prep team is) she will constantly bring the debate around to how the american people can see Trump is actually part of and owes any success he has had by BEING establishment and playing the exact game the wall Street guys played: ****ing the little guy...she's not arguing she's not establishment just that she's learned from earlier policy failures. Trump has relied on saying he's anti establishment and it's been exposed as a lie..keep hammering it. Keep her head when he brings up the infidelities and rape accusations...don't respond like for like. If she's going to try and send him psycho; it's more of the same...call him out on failure after failure...his whole psyche is reliant on his ego..the fact that he constantly has to reference anybody who he thinks gave him a pat on the head shows he knows he's a fraud and is terrified it's highlighted....so highlight highlight highlight. I honestly believe she could make him go nuts in front of 80 million people live on air...he's incredibly fragile...Problem is I don't think Hillary her self has the skill as a debater to do it....
trump MUST be desperately trying to offend everyone cos no matter how hard he tries he keeps coming up in the pools such is the hatred of clinton. Trump has boasted about the tax stuff and is now trying to insult veterens as not being tough enough.
