Off Topic Trumpy pumpy.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Their grandpa's need to pull out their WWii medals and remind them they fought ****s likey thay have become, smack them on the head and tell them to beha e.
The irony is that the same kind of ****s in this country use their grandpas' sacrifices as the reason why we need to stop foreigners coming here.

Did they fight to take back control or for freedom?
 
The irony is that the same kind of ****s in this country use their grandpas' sacrifices as the reason why we need to stop foreigners coming here.

Did they fight to take back control or for freedom?

Their grandpa's were the ones that originally coined the phrase "America First" and did exactly the same marches arguing the US shouldn't fight hilter.... inbetween lynching obviously...
 
Their grandpa's were the ones that originally coined the phrase "America First" and did exactly the same marches arguing the US shouldn't fight hilter.... inbetween lynching obviously...
Our grandpas over here fought Hitler for a free Europe. The far right claim we owe that generation a Britain detached from Europe and any other "undesirables".
 
  • Like
Reactions: DirtyFrank
Here's one who is defending the actions of the white supremacists.

http://www.not606.com/threads/the-p...serious-or-not.341752/page-1880#post-10841727

That conversation between DMD and saxton reminds me of when you got two furbies, put them one foot apart facing each other, and they'd happily chat, repeating each other's incomprehensible banalities for hours. Seriously, I know it's censorship, but can't this pondlife be restricted to the swamp that is General Chat? I mean wouldn't these creatures be happier in their own homeland?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DirtyFrank and Stan
That conversation between DMD and saxton reminds me of when you got two furbies, put them one foot apart facing each other, and they'd happily chat, repeating each other's incomprehensible banalities for hours. Seriously, I know it's censorship, but can't this pondlife be restricted to the swamp that is General Chat? I mean wouldn't these creatures be happier in their own homeland?
GC would tear that pair of simpletons a new one and then pass them around :emoticon-0130-devil
 
Washington (CNN)President Donald Trump, facing mounting pressure from Republicans and Democrats alike, did what he declined to do over the weekend during an event at the White House on Monday when he directly condemned white supremacists and neo-Nazis in a brief statement to reporters.
"Racism is evil -- and those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs, including KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other hate groups are repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans," Trump said in response to the attacks in Charlottesville, Virginia, over the weekend.
"Those who spread violence in the name of bigotry strike at the very core of America," Trump said.
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/08/14/politics/trump-condemns-charlottesville-attackers/index.html
Tell Congress, Stop Trump From Starting Nuclear War
Many would say that Donald Trump should be the last person authorized to launch US nuclear weapons. In fact, he is the only person that is.

As shocking as it sounds, President Trump alone has the power to launch thousands of nuclear weapons — enough to end life on Earth as we know it. He does not have to consult anyone. He does not need the consent of military commanders, his Cabinet or Congress. He can pick up the phone and within 4 minutes send nuclear missiles flying across the world.

Together, we can change that. Two members of Congress, Rep. Ted Lieu and Sen. Ed Markey, have proposed urgent legislation to prevent the President from starting a nuclear war. The New York Times endorsed the legislation in a major editorial, writing that it "sends a clear message to Mr. Trump that he should not be the first since World War II to use nuclear weapons."

Ploughshares Fund has partnered with Global Zero, Daily Kos, the Union of Concerned Scientists, Win Without War, Women's Action for New Directions and several other groups on a new petition calling on Congress to support this important bill. We need your help now to make sure our voices are heard.
You must log in or register to see images

http://www.ploughshares.org/tell-co...MI2qb9tfDY1QIVzbXtCh2Z9AJDEAAYASAAEgJJzPD_BwE
 
Yeahhhhhh.... see this is why you don't elect a lunatic who is unstable.

You CANNOT pass a law that says in the eventbof an attack on the us that you will have a debate.... not strike back.

The whole point of the thing as scary as it sounds is the other players know the us can and will respond as soon as a missile is detected in the air.. mutually assured destruction.

If the Cuban missile crisis has required Kennedy to get congress to pass a vote. The us would be a red state today... maybe.

People seeking to change this need to grow up and realise what the world is

Next time yanks... pick your candidates better... like seriously you had lots of opportunites to pick several other candidates.
 
His Hull fanboy is still firmly behind and in him.

This is finally the beginning of the end for Trump.
Lol....i sobered up and decided I couldn't be arsed arguing circular nonsense with the likes of those 2...

Can't see even the weakest of Republicans thinking they'd survive an election supporting him on this. Democrats will literally make any election a one issue game.