He played more than well enough in a back 2 imo, though I agree he was more suited to a 3. Doubt Barbet demanded to be one our best paid either but we don't know about that. I'd have preferred that we had kept Barbet, and, a big If of course, got a really good wedge for Dickie from a PL Club rumoured before to be interested in him. Then we could still have had for example if we play with a 2, Dunne and Barbet as our starting CB's with Jordi and Masterson in reserve, plus Cash to spend on the new Back and/ or a lower league striker with good potential, positions we look to have a greater need to fill. With Barbet, I'd have thought Dickie is the best saleable asset we could sell without missing too much if we are going with a two. Without Barbet, we are less likely to sell Dickie but the chances that we sell Dieng, Chair or Willock probably increase. I hope we can hold onto them for at least another season, especially Willock and Dieng.