Transfer Rumours Transfer Rumours thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Spurs are free to bid for Ings.

If or once his contract is over, then it goes to tribunal where a fee will be discussed - the fee relating to compensation/contribution towards development costs etc.

Spurs bidding £12m before his contract over could lead to a higher fee that LFC would have to pay.
 
Jimmy Squarefoot said:
Spurs are free to bid for Ings.

If or once his contract is over, then it goes to tribunal where a fee will be discussed - the fee relating to compensation/contribution towards development costs etc.

Spurs bidding £12m before his contract over could lead to a higher fee that LFC would have to pay.
Click to expand...

How does this tribunal thing work? I'm guessing that any Spurs bid would only affect the compensation part as it has no relevance towards the development costs that Burnley have borne.
 
Nozzer said:
How does this tribunal thing work? I'm guessing that any Spurs bid would only affect the compensation part as it has no relevance towards the development costs that Burnley have borne.
Click to expand...

No idea really. I'm guessing that Burnely will use Ing's market value (i.e. £12m) to prove that Ings is worth more than what Liverpool expect to pay (e.g. £4m)
 
Some very interesting comments from Tony Barrett:

There were members of the committee that did not want Mario Balotelli.

Others saw him as less than ideal short term solution. The fact they were in that position in the first place is the biggest problem.

As far as the club and owners are concerned, Rodgers remains as manager. The only grey area concerns the parameters that Rodgers will be asked to work within.
 
He then goes onto say that the Spurs bid could be a deliberate ploy to inflate the price which will eat into our budget.
 
Jimmy Squarefoot said:
Spurs are free to bid for Ings.

If or once his contract is over, then it goes to tribunal where a fee will be discussed - the fee relating to compensation/contribution towards development costs etc.

Spurs bidding £12m before his contract over could lead to a higher fee that LFC would have to pay.
Click to expand...
How can Spurs bid for Ings when the window doesn't actually open until the day after his contract expires?

It's a complete nonsense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Super G Ted'inho
Tobes said:
How can Spurs bid for Ings when the window doesn't actually open until the day after his contract expires?

It's a complete nonsense.
Click to expand...

Perhaps it's an enquiry? Either way, now people are talking about his market value at £12m. That may play a part in the tribunal.
 
Jimmy Squarefoot said:
Perhaps it's an enquiry? Either way, now people are talking about his market value at £12m. That may play a part in the tribunal.
Click to expand...
His market value is £0, as he's on a free.

The tribunal will set his compensation figure based on some form of mystical calculation worked out on the back of a *** packet.

It's impossible to attribute an actual market value to him, as it'd be nothing more than subjective opinion i.e. a complete guess <laugh>
 
Tobes said:
His market value is £0, as he's on a free.

The tribunal will set his compensation figure based on some form of mystical calculation worked out on the back of a *** packet.

It's impossible to attribute an actual market value to him, as it'd be nothing more than subjective opinion i.e. a complete guess <laugh>
Click to expand...

That's the worrying thing. Who's to say that the rumoured 12 million won't somehow be included in the mystical calculation?

Let's be honest, it appears that no-one here really seems to know how the amount will be decided and what, if any, effect any Spurs bid would have on the final amount.
 
Tobes said:
His market value is £0, as he's on a free.

The tribunal will set his compensation figure based on some form of mystical calculation worked out on the back of a *** packet.

It's impossible to attribute an actual market value to him, as it'd be nothing more than subjective opinion i.e. a complete guess <laugh>
Click to expand...

And the compensation could factor in the £12m bid. <ok>
 
Nozzer said:
That's the worrying thing. Who's to say that the rumoured 12 million won't somehow be included in the mystical calculation?

Let's be honest, it appears that no-one here really seems to know how the amount will be decided and what, if any, effect any Spurs bid would have on the final amount.
Click to expand...
Spurs can't bid, that's the point, it's a complete red herring.
 
Jimmy Squarefoot said:
And the compensation could factor in the £12m bid. <ok>
Click to expand...
What 'bid'?

They can't bid for him, as they couldn't complete a deal while he was still under contract to Burnley, as the window is shut.

Whoever has leaked this one is on crack and so are Sky for running it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: abc_220
Tobes said:
Spurs can't bid, that's the point, it's a complete red herring.
Click to expand...

Maybe not, and even if they could, 12 million for someone with less than a week on their contract is stupid. But who's to say that, if the pricing process for the tribunal is not transparent, any such "bid" could play a role. Hopefully it won't, and it probably shouldn't, but I wouldn't want to completely rule it out.
 
Tobes said:
What 'bid'?

They can't bid for him, as they couldn't complete a deal while he was still under contract to Burnley, as the window is shut.

Whoever has leaked this one is on crack and so are Sky for running it.
Click to expand...

Hasn't stopped United "signing" Depay, has it?
 
please note that the tribunal sets compensation for training the player not his market worth.

like... we could then say hey.. real madrid might bid 160million for stelring so force arsenal to pay 60 for sterling... thats not how it works.

the consensus is this guy will go for about 6 mil.

for me.... the fact he says he is off on hols... well that tells me nobody has been knocking his door down.
 
Tobes said:
Depay isn't out of contract on the 1st July <doh>

All parties have agreed to the deal and it'll complete the day the window opens i.e. 1st July
Click to expand...

But the the English window opens 9th June, so there is overlap for Ings between his contract being over and transfer window opening
 
Jimmy Squarefoot said:
Some very interesting comments from Tony Barrett:

There were members of the committee that did not want Mario Balotelli.

Others saw him as less than ideal short term solution. The fact they were in that position in the first place is the biggest problem.

As far as the club and owners are concerned, Rodgers remains as manager. The only grey area concerns the parameters that Rodgers will be asked to work within.
Click to expand...

If there members on the panel that didn't want Mario and we still signed him then those members need sacking. Complete lack of bollocks to stand by their own minds!
 
  • Like
Reactions: abc_220
Jimmy Squarefoot said:
Perhaps it's an enquiry? Either way, now people are talking about his market value at £12m. That may play a part in the tribunal.
Click to expand...

Market value as zero impact on the tribunal figure. Especially when that market value is zero because the player is out of contract.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back