Transfer Rumours Transfer Rumours thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
InBiscanWeTrust said:
How did it break him? He picked up an injury. Did the Pl break de bruyne cos he was injured for a bit last season? What about Jota he was injured.
Click to expand...

I think it’s more of a case that we upped Baj’s minutes drastically rather than easing him into it.

Hopefully we can manage him better this season
 
saintKlopp said:
It was a direct response to a post saying that we'd lost six players and the inference being that three replacements wouldn't be enough. I was just pointing out that those six (only five really, I don't count Firmino) amounted to significantly fewer minutes than you'd expect, and three replacements should cover it.
If we get Lavia, we really need to move our recruitment priorities to the back line - which would be much lighter than the rest of the team.
Click to expand...
Fab and Henderson were the 5th and 7th on mins played in PL and the top 2 midfielders with Elliott next highest .
 
organic red said:
Seems like £42.5m plus £2.5m in add ons
Click to expand...

Bit expensive, but needed doing. Still think we need another midfielder and one defender. But it's not as bad as I feared it would be with FSG, I think it means we'll have a few quiet windows now, unless, one hopes, someone like Colwill becomes available and we don't get into a bidding war.
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnsonsbaby
Evil Roy Slade said:
Bit expensive, but needed doing. Still think we need another midfielder and one defender. But it's not as bad as I feared it would be with FSG, I think it means we'll have a few quiet windows now, unless, one hopes, someone like Colwill becomes available and we don't get into a bidding war.
Click to expand...

unfortunately you can't even by a shrivelled testicle in the prem for less than 40mil.

(yes henderson is worse than a shrivelled testicle which is exactly what fabinho looks like and is)

i'm on or about 78 mil in net spend before this transfer so that'd be putting us up to 120mil... or call it 80mil net once the scrotum goes.


room for a 30mil sale of kelleher to make this a 50mil net spend season folks.
 
moreinjuredthanowen said:
unfortunately you can't even by a shrivelled testicle in the prem for less than 40mil.

(yes henderson is worse than a shrivelled testicle which is exactly what fabinho looks like and is)

i'm on or about 78 mil in net spend before this transfer so that'd be putting us up to 120mil... or call it 80mil net once the scrotum goes.


room for a 30mil sale of kelleher to make this a 50mil net spend season folks.
Click to expand...

We can't sell Kelleher unless we have somebody else lined up. Adrianne was pathetic the other day.
 
Evil Roy Slade said:
We can't sell Kelleher unless we have somebody else lined up. Adrianne was pathetic the other day.
Click to expand...

so?

When's thst ever stopped us?

no rb at all and boom.trent and gomez fill I'm
no lb. use milner
etc etc

we have pitaluga and jaros left from the centre of excellence as we have loaned Davies. there is another kid below them as well.

if wolves.make a big offer for kelleher then imo we will make the call.

but the real point is as of now from what we know it only takes a sale of 30mil to get us back to 50mil net.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back