Transfer Rumours Transfer Rumours thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
moreinjuredthanowen said:
Gakpo has an agent working hard on a plan to get him a big move anywhere. he's linked all over the place lads. theres zero point paying any attention to that kind of rumour mill.

Mount is just after a bigger contract at Chelsea.

Rice is just lazy hackery. west ham are in trouble now cos they've overpriced the asset when they had power ande that power is rapidly running out. he has also turned down 200k a week. He wants cheslea. we all know it really.

Laimer is going to bayern.


Amrabat is one of those usual world cup links nobody can tell if its hacks or agents, or something else.

Kudus doesn't really make a lot of sense frankly.

Enzo Fernandez makes more sense but you have to factor in the old agent stuff. he's bee linked to man utd first and any time then other clubs start coming up you have to suspect its to keep the name in lights. its the same old stuff really

We clearly need players jan 1 not jan31 but at this point its very highly doubtful the club will do anyhting until we are out of the race for top 4.
Click to expand...

Ainsley Maitland-Niles on loan from Southampton on deadline day. You heard it here first.
 
  • Like
Reactions: moreinjuredthanowen
Stanley J Krammerhead III said:
Seriously though, IF we're being sold, and IF it's to a serious buyer rather than carpet-bagging asset-strippers like Hicks and Gillet, surely there is nothing in the rules to stop FSG from going on a billion-pound spree in January to strengthen the squad, then lump it onto the debts of the club as a loan to be paid off a-la Chelsea and their one-and-a-half billion debt to Abramovich that was paid off without a peep? It would surely be within the new owners' interest (if they are serious) to circumvent FFP like Chelsea did, or should we just hope we get owners who are rich enough to bung the CAS like City's owners did?
Click to expand...

We may not get anyone for months or years. I imagine not a lot of people want to buy a club right before a recession.

Lots of links, but we could still be run by FSG this time next year.
 
Croatian defender Gvardiol - "From a young age I watched Liverpool games with my dad and I grew up with just them.... I definitely want the Premier League and Liverpool move one day".

Sven Mislintat lined up as candidate for Sporting Director role, worked with Klopp at Dortmund and still good friends ....
 
johnsonsbaby said:
Croatian defender Gvardiol - "From a young age I watched Liverpool games with my dad and I grew up with just them.... I definitely want the Premier League and Liverpool move one day".

Sven Mislintat lined up as candidate for Sporting Director role, worked with Klopp at Dortmund and still good friends ....
Click to expand...

Gvardoil ain't big enough nor quick enough. Pass

The other fella? No idea.
 
Red Potato said:
We may not get anyone for months or years. I imagine not a lot of people want to buy a club right before a recession.

Lots of links, but we could still be run by FSG this time next year.
Click to expand...

Hmm, I dunno. Something spooked United into diving in when they did. I think there's a big beast out there, and maybe they were inclining towards Liverpool, but United are obviously very confident they'll get them, otherwise, they'll look total twats shouting "We're here too!" like a prozzie on Huskisson St (so I'm told) seeing another streetwalker about to get into a Bentley.
 
Stanley J Krammerhead III said:
Hmm, I dunno. Something spooked United into diving in when they did. I think there's a big beast out there, and maybe they were inclining towards Liverpool, but United are obviously very confident they'll get them, otherwise, they'll look total twats shouting "We're here too!" like a prozzie on Huskisson St (so I'm told) seeing another streetwalker about to get into a Bentley.
Click to expand...
Man U will end up with either Ratcliffe or Apple.

I suspect Ratcliffe as he seems serious about them and would be willing to pay what the Glazers want.
Apple I guess are proabably looking more from the business angle and would want to negotiate them down as that makes business sense.
 
RogerisontheHunt said:
Man U will end up with either Ratcliffe or Apple.

I suspect Ratcliffe as he seems serious about them and would be willing to pay what the Glazers want.
Apple I guess are proabably looking more from the business angle and would want to negotiate them down as that makes business sense.
Click to expand...

If they get Apple they've seriously won the lottery. They'll never be short of money, they'll have no debt and Apple will want them right and forefront of every competition wearing their brand. They'll be bigger than Real, and I say that without any hyperbole whatsoever. And Apple will be able to put the whole cost of it all against tax for advertising expenses.

But I'm ****ing cancelling Apple+ and I'll ignore any calls family and friends make to me on apple phones. And I'll chop my apple tree down. :emoticon-0114-dull:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Solid Air, saintanton, johnsonsbaby and 1 other person
Stanley J Krammerhead III said:
If they get Apple they've seriously won the lottery. They'll never be short of money, they'll have no debt and Apple will want them right and forefront of every competition wearing their brand. They'll be bigger than Real, and I say that without any hyperbole whatsoever. And Apple will be able to put the whole cost of it all against tax for advertising expenses.

But I'm ****ing cancelling Apple+ and I'll ignore any calls family and friends make to me on apple phones. And I'll chop my apple tree down. :emoticon-0114-dull:
Click to expand...

Well the thing is all these companies are losing money aren't they?

Apple ain't Disney but have flirted with a lot of loss aiming businesses like apple TV and cars etc. Buying a football team would absolutely make zero sense. Thry don't even sponsor any???
 
moreinjuredthanowen said:
Well the thing is all these companies are losing money aren't they?

Apple ain't Disney but have flirted with a lot of loss aiming businesses like apple TV and cars etc. Buying a football team would absolutely make zero sense. Thry don't even sponsor any???
Click to expand...

Not like Apple need publicity either
 
  • Like
Reactions: johnsonsbaby
Stanley J Krammerhead III said:
If they get Apple they've seriously won the lottery. They'll never be short of money, they'll have no debt and Apple will want them right and forefront of every competition wearing their brand. They'll be bigger than Real, and I say that without any hyperbole whatsoever. And Apple will be able to put the whole cost of it all against tax for advertising expenses.

But I'm ****ing cancelling Apple+ and I'll ignore any calls family and friends make to me on apple phones. And I'll chop my apple tree down. :emoticon-0114-dull:
Click to expand...



I don't know. Apple would certainly mean they can float in any recession, but I doubt they would try buying the league like City. They're a business, not a charity.
 
Stanley J Krammerhead III said:
Hmm, I dunno. Something spooked United into diving in when they did. I think there's a big beast out there, and maybe they were inclining towards Liverpool, but United are obviously very confident they'll get them, otherwise, they'll look total twats shouting "We're here too!" like a prozzie on Huskisson St (so I'm told) seeing another streetwalker about to get into a Bentley.
Click to expand...


I think Glazers, just like FSG know there is a recession around the corner and it will be a long time before the clubs are as valuable again in the future as they are now.

In a recession if you're wealthy the best way to make money is buying all the businesses that couldn't survive the recession but could have long term profitability.

Buy all your neighbours houses when they lose their jobs and charge them rent!

Spending 4 billion gobbling up little companies during the recession could earn you 20 billion when it ends.

4 billion locked in a football club won't earn you anything and will take years for club to be worth that again.

I think the owners realise now is their last chance to make mega profits until the next boom cycle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Solid Air and Ivan Dobsky
Red Potato said:
I think Glazers, just like FSG know there is a recession around the corner and it will be a long time before the clubs are as valuable again in the future as they are now.

In a recession if you're wealthy the best way to make money is buying all the businesses that couldn't survive the recession but could have long term profitability.

Buy all your neighbours houses when they lose their jobs and charge them rent!

Spending 4 billion gobbling up little companies during the recession could earn you 20 billion when it ends.

4 billion locked in a football club won't earn you anything and will take years for club to be worth that again.

I think the owners realise now is their last chance to make mega profits until the next boom cycle.
Click to expand...

Well they are years late in realising it then lol.

The only people willing will be megalomaniac and despots who don't care about recessions and only care about rep
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back