You must log in or register to see images
Assuming something different happening this year if it's PL sanctioned...why would they need to sanction it if it's not going to be on the shirt in PL games?
now... most significantly
You must log in or register to see images
no coutinho
really stupid sponsorship BTW.... but look at that pick.. not one sign of coutinho... no tell me his back injury prevent him from throwing on a shirt![]()
really stupid sponsorship BTW.... but look at that pick.. not one sign of coutinho... no tell me his back injury prevent him from throwing on a shirt![]()
Apparently .... ''The Premier League allows its clubs to add a second sponsor logo to their shirts, the left sleeve specifically, with the league badge only appearing on the other arm from 2017-18 onwards.''
Apparently not.thats the "barkleys" sleeve then. they used to have the prem sponsors logo on one sleeve and the prem logo on the other.
obvioulsy so much money washing about the prem isn't bothered any more
blame trump for stirring up suadi arabia on his trip who have targetted qatar to destruction and now qatar and trying to show thier might globally to show sanctions are not working.
Remember monaco nearly imploding after buying falcao and all those loans etc...
well..... PSG could easily go tits up if they are saddled with 2/3 million a week wages on a couple players and no way to pay it.
Apparently not.
Just out of interest mito how does feigning a back injury mean he's after a move? I know players feign injury to avoid international friendlies but what logic is there in the Coutinho 'injury'?
Just out of interest mito how does feigning a back injury mean he's after a move? I know players feign injury to avoid international friendlies but what logic is there in the Coutinho 'injury'?
Same thing happens in tennis with sleeve sponsors but the player will be getting that money right? In football the club benefits surely like with the main shirt sponsor with logos on the front of the shirt. They're far more distracting imo.i seems to be reminded of either F! racing suits or nascar type guys wandering around covered in logos.
its stupid money for nothing yet just another.. not our sport thing creeping in.
Just out of interest mito how does feigning a back injury mean he's after a move? I know players feign injury to avoid international friendlies but what logic is there in the Coutinho 'injury'?
Same thing happens in tennis with sleeve sponsors but the player will be getting that money right? In football the club benefits surely like with the main shirt sponsor with logos on the front of the shirt. They're far more distracting imo.
I see the logic in that if you're a willing seller, protect the player but it's the opposite with us and Coutinho so no logic in that at all.So he didn't need to play in the friendly and potentially the start of the season (if hes still injured). That way he can't get properly injured affecting his move to Barca (not that i believe this but thats why you'd feign an injury)
It doesn't pass the sniff test.
just watch for the training pic shots this week. LFC have all last season had pre match training shots.
watch klopps presser tomorrow.
I see the logic in that if you're a willing seller, protect the player but it's the opposite with us and Coutinho so no logic in that at all.