That probably meant something in your head when you typed it, well saidHarsh truth time.... your club owners saddled yoy with debt and us buying your played allowed you to pay it off
we saved you lot. Be a little grateful
That probably meant something in your head when you typed it, well saidHarsh truth time.... your club owners saddled yoy with debt and us buying your played allowed you to pay it off
we saved you lot. Be a little grateful
Cheeky, but I'll humour you.
You took Lambert so as to sweeten Adam (then dumped himlike trash). Adam turned full brat & refused to play for us after signing a five year deal & winning poty. £20m, -25% to B'mouth.
Tapped up Lovren, who didn't need much incentive, he knew he was a bit ****. But we paid 8.5 one year earlier, so that was hardly a great deal.
Mane went for 34M a week before Bolasie got sold, don't think I'll ever forgive the board for that.
Clyne, was fully briefed by you before he signed.
Stinks the way you have done business, but what is worse is the way you pretend its okay, then get upset when it happens to you.
No need to push a player the fans already love, at this time of the year new signings are the ones to push. By November the old guard will be back unless one of the new ones makes a big impression.
its jimmy milner and klopp and you can only get a coutinho old signed shirt The call for Coutinho replacing Iniesta is valid (not that I think he is good enoughI think Dybala is a good shout, hell of a player and a forward, so more of a direct replacement
That probably meant something in your head when you typed it, well said![]()
![]()
The call for Coutinho replacing Iniesta is valid (not that I think he is good enough), but as a Neymar replacement it's a non-starter.
Drivel. The question I asked was about your claim that we got you players after haggling the price down - ludicrous. Not one player there, even Mane, was bought for anything but the asking price (plus 20% more, in the case of Lovren). Our (or at least mine) gripe wit Barca is that we've been utterly shafted by them twice now over Masch and Luis, Luis especially. And should you be arsed to look back through this thread you'd see that i (and a few others) have said unequivocally that VVD should have put in a TR, honoured his contract and got on with his job
But anyway, it's not about the tactics and agents and whatnots, it's about you claiming that we haggled prices down. Did we ****, and you know you have no evidence to say otherwise. We, on the otherhand, were butt-****ed over Suarez way before Lallana or Lovren were even a twinkle in your eye.
So it's fair to rape em when they're tied up but you don't like it when they can fight back?It needs to be said. Southampton have been selling players to pay thier debt for several years... they get all uppity when suddenly the debt is low enough not to need to sell... strange that..
But funniest of all is the innocence act when they knew paying vvds agent to advise him to sign a stupidly long contract was no more than playing the same game we all do.
Very true, I actually think Mata could do a job for them for a couple of years if given the chance.Who is good enough to replace Iniesta though? Truely WC playmaker. Who ever comes in won't be as good as him. Similar to what ever they do when thy need to try replace Suarez and Messi.
So it's fair to rape em when they're tied up but you don't like it when they can fight back?
I would think VvD paid his agent for the deal he made, good or bad it was VvDs decision to sign.
Very true, I actually think Mata could do a job for them for a couple of years if given the chance.
There are certain players who you just can't see replacements for and Barca have been blessed with them, Xavi, Iniesta, Messi and Suarez. These are (imo) one offs and will be hard to replicate again in one team.
Very true, I actually think Mata could do a job for them for a couple of years if given the chance.
There are certain players who you just can't see replacements for and Barca have been blessed with them, Xavi, Iniesta, Messi and Suarez. These are (imo) one offs and will be hard to replicate again in one team.
Could anyone replace Iniesta. Extreme talent and one club playerThe call for Coutinho replacing Iniesta is valid (not that I think he is good enough), but as a Neymar replacement it's a non-starter.
How... did suarez bite the italian to ruin his countrys world cup and his international career on Barca's request?
i dont see what barca did in this case...
As for masch... **** me but anyone with talent wanted away from g&h.. so they played the same courtship game... so what?
as i said. Its big boy games. Lfc pay 180k before tax. Barca pay it afyer tax... min.. move on i say.
In all seriousness, I can understand their supporters being pissed off at losing their best players all the time, but that's modern football.So it's fair to rape em when they're tied up but you don't like it when they can fight back?
I would think VvD paid his agent for the deal he made, good or bad it was VvDs decision to sign.
Damn wums ehBarca got Luis for £65m after agreeing the £75m price, this after going into negotiations saying how much they 'respected ' us, then opening up a contract negotiation with his agent (Deja vu?), and then sealing it off by (correctly, as Wikileaks confirmed later) crowing that they haggled £10m off the agreed price - then we paid the agent's fees too! And in all this, because of the biting, they made out like they were doing us a favour.
And Masch was advised by them to pull out of the opening game of the season and go on strike long. long before we ever bought a player from Soton. No, I appreciate you're a bit of a bogus poster on this board, but do your ****ing homework if you're pretending to be a Liverpool fan, or just **** off to the Uniturd board and stop pretending not to be another Diego account.![]()

Very true, I actually think Mata could do a job for them for a couple of years if given the chance.
There are certain players who you just can't see replacements for and Barca have been blessed with them, Xavi, Iniesta, Messi and Suarez. These are (imo) one offs and will be hard to replicate again in one team.

Barca got Luis for £65m after agreeing the £75m price, this after going into negotiations saying how much they 'respected ' us, then opening up a contract negotiation with his agent (Deja vu?), and then sealing it off by (correctly, as Wikileaks confirmed later) crowing that they haggled £10m off the agreed price - then we paid the agent's fees too! And in all this, because of the biting, they made out like they were doing us a favour.
And Masch was advised by them to pull out of the opening game of the season and go on strike long. long before we ever bought a player from Soton. No, I appreciate you're a bit of a bogus poster on this board, but do your ****ing homework if you're pretending to be a Liverpool fan, or just **** off to the Uniturd board and stop pretending not to be another Diego account.![]()