Transfer Rumours Transfer Rumours thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Think its possible that we may see Gomez get some gametime as RB as JK seems to prefer TAA as RM.

don't think so.

I think klopp just thinks taa hasn't a clue how to defend at senior level yet.

Gomez is more solid so i think he will be kept in there as long as we have the same cbs we do now as well..

Flanagan is boned.

so.... clyne would want to buck up a bit and get fit. i could see him replaced if not by one or both of these. Its not like the guy has much big game nouse anyway... he's hardly played any :(
 
don't think so.

I think klopp just thinks taa hasn't a clue how to defend at senior level yet.

Gomez is more solid so i think he will be kept in there as long as we have the same cbs we do now as well..

Flanagan is boned.

so.... clyne would want to buck up a bit and get fit. i could see him replaced if not by one or both of these. Its not like the guy has much big game nouse anyway... he's hardly played any :(
so you do think so :huh:
 
so you do think so :huh:

no i don't.

theres no such position as right midfield in klopps current 433.

he's playing virtual RW but from a RB starting position due to our dominance in preseason <ok>

he will play Rb for us in a few games this year. how many is up to his speed of learning the defensive requirements.
 
I still think we'll have two new players come the end of the window but have no clue who.


It's also infuriating they don't get the business done sooner. Instead of having all summer to get a good sense of how teammates play any sod now will be just learning by the time the league starts again. Nothing beats a good consistent summer when you're not preparing for imminent games.
 
They are in it for the money.
Who isn't?
However, every good businessman knows you have to invest wisely to make money. They've spent big several times since they took over,
and they may just believe that the possibility of sustained success brought by keeping your best players brings better dividends than a short term cash-in.
 
Who isn't?
However, every good businessman knows you have to invest wisely to make money. They've spent big several times since they took over,
and they may just believe that the possibility of sustained success brought by keeping your best players brings better dividends than a short term cash-in.


They bought a club for £200m that had been valued a year before at £500m, with a minimal 'stadium' debt of £50m (don't forget, H&G rightly got lumbered with the rest of the debt), and that is now worth, according to the latest Forbes estimates, £1.1bn (yes, sterling). That's what FSG are in it for, and my only fear is that there are, possibly, some worse.
 
They bought a club for £200m that had been valued a year before at £500m, with a minimal 'stadium' debt of £50m (don't forget, H&G rightly got lumbered with the rest of the debt), and that is now worth, according to the latest Forbes estimates, £1.1bn (yes, sterling). That's what FSG are in it for, and my only fear is that there are, possibly, some worse.
That valuation isn't readies though, is it? They can't just go and spend it.
Perhaps they're trying to build the value of the club to a point where they want to sell it, who knows? However, if they do, who would we want to be in charge - because as you say, there are probably a lot worse. We need to be careful what we wish for.