It's a shame we won't see the style of attack we had in 13/14 any time soon.
Running in behind defences will be a thing of the past.
Running in behind defences will be a thing of the past.
Imagine if we spend £32m and Origi usurps Benteke like that he has in the Belgium team.
I really believe Benteke is not Rodgers target. He's the committees target and is being based on stats.

I really believe Benteke is not Rodgers target. He's the committees target and is being based on stats.
TBF Benteke's stats are impressive. Your ignoring a few things in that comparison. Benteke was awesome in his first season. Unfortunately he then suffered a serious injury and took a long time to recover. He scored 12 goals in Villa's last 12 games last season.Same amount got Arsenal a title and CL winner in Sanchez.
Same amount got Chelsea a La Liga title winner in Costa.
£25m for United one of the best young talents in world football in Depay.
£32.5m plus gets us a player from Villa with an ordinary record.
the Echo and other itk journos really do not see that as being the case tbh. I sincerely doubt the transfer committee would spend 32m on a target man if BR hadn't been well and truly behind it. It's BR's signing, and signals a return to his old philosophy of snail pace build up possession football with no end product. 13/14 was a fluke ignited by Suarez and his brilliance.

Bringing in O'Driscol, a pass and move coach, backs up your theory. But with players like Firminio I do not share your doubts about end product.the Echo and other itk journos really do not see that as being the case tbh. I sincerely doubt the transfer committee would spend 32m on a target man if BR hadn't been well and truly behind it. It's BR's signing, and signals a return to his old philosophy of snail pace build up possession football with no end product. 13/14 was a fluke ignited by Suarez and his brilliance.
TBF Benteke's stats are impressive. Your ignoring a few things in that comparison. Benteke was awesome in his first season. Unfortunately he then suffered a serious injury and took a long time to recover. He scored 12 goals in Villa's last 12 games last season.
Sanchez was an under appreciated bench warmer at Barca. Pedro is possibly available but he's not a proper striker.
No one like Costa is available this summer. But with Costa's fitness issues I do not see him as a long term option for Chelsea.
City now have SAS...so our attacking line is going to be ..SBI
You never truly know what your going to get.Pedro as a forward is a far better option than Benteke.
But the point I'm making is that when you spend that much on a player, you expect quality. With Benteke, we don't know what we're gonna get.
Our two biggest signings in history are Carroll and Benteke.
Bringing in O'Driscol, a pass and move coach, backs up your theory. But with players like Firminio I do not share your doubts about end product.
I dont believe we have the right midfielders to play 4231 though. I expect 433 or 41212.
You never truly know what your going to get.
Playing chessy football without winning anything is rubbish. Playing like Jose's team..do not concede first is what we need.Don't agree with signing Benteke or the price but I think symbolises that Rodgers knows he is under pressure and if he's going to be sacked, he will do it on his terms, playing his style and with his players.
Playing chessy football without winning anything is rubbish. Playing like Jose's team..do not concede first is what we need.
The list of big names who have moved with a big reputation and big price tag and have still failed is pretty substantial.True but in the cases of Costa and Sanchez, you know you're getting top quality players with evidence of winning and playing with top players.
Benteke is unproven.