.sigh... rubbish. he literally olly just announces it. as for rashford not a striker .. come on... as for laughing at morata... quality player.
give over Zlatan has hardly set foot on the pitch all season & has been known to be leaving for some time. Morata may become a top quality player in future but atm he is a decent player who has struggled with the demands of the PL particularly as in effect the only striker the Chelsea manager would play .
ah ha! amd ing and sturridge have? the very two im told we have as options! i note youve not come back on rashford who is totally 100% a striker shoved wide cos mourinho doesnt like martial. ive pointed out morata and you laugh but he had got 13 goals so far this season which is ok for a debut year. i point out giroud but obviously that doesnt suit. i dont need to point out the lad chelsea let go either cos you know what... other clubs managers deciding to be dicks with their players is not our problem is it. the reality here is ive pointed out each rival has the options at no 9. and across their front line bar as you pointed out spurs. every time kanr is injured they drop off but are using son there now and habe lloenta but dont play him we need to keep improving and rhat means buying a quality player to replace sturridge and origi rather than rely on ings and solanke
your point. which had nothing to do with my point and they were not contradictory at all as independent arguments.
oh so Hazard has been playing CF as Chelsea didn't want to tire out their quality back up. How often has Rashford played as CF. Yes we need another forward replacement somewhere along front 3 but you argued that all the other top 6 had 2 quality players for each position & i pointed out that aint necessarily so. Still think our replacement policy ,if any, up front may be determined by whom we can offload.
not my problem mate conte cost them the cl and results in prem with that call. mourinho sticking the better player wide cos hes more willing to run than lucky is not my problem either. utd best game under utd was 442 with lingard and rashford up top. same then dor kane. if poch wants to knacker the guy great. run him into the ground. rival teams with options cutting their own noses off.. really i love that you are making a different point about offloading now. i will certainly not argue that with you at all. as of today we have taken a risk that our front 3 will stay fit and our season hinges on it. this all started with ings and solanke as good enough for next year. not obe person has answered this. would anyone be happy with one of those in our team for 3 months next season based on them being good enough then we find firmino injured. i certainly would not be.
no i have said about oh... 6 times now nobody can answer that and have mentions august and September several.times. i dont give a flying f who it is. as i said originally roo. i have avoided saying it should be who the press have said. whoever klopp wants i dont care but if we rely on ings and solanke we run a huge risk. see 2009. gerrard and torres... why would we need anyone else like.. them both get a couple injuries and we are too far back despite hammering utd at old trafford. lfc need real competition and options. my original point in comparing us to city was showing we have options in every area bar up front. i made the point how robertson v moreno has driven both players on. who is driving our front 3. if mane has a stinker he will be in next game.
No one has said its ideal but that is the reality as decisions were made in Jan. An obvious assumption is that a) Klopp was happy to "swop " Ford for VVD and/or b) Klopp didn't fancy any forwards which were available.
If memory serves me right, it wasn't you that I quoted with said questions. So your are right for once, it had **** all to do with what you said (unless you claimed to know which transfer budget the Keita money came from)
no it wasn't me. you just said nobody answered so i thought i woyld do you the curtosy. oh and im always right. but i am so ****ing right on this striker thing its unreal.
Given that you bid for both Keita and VvD last summer I would assume they were both out of last summers budget. If both had gone well would you have sold Coutinho at the same time to pay for them, my guess is yes but that's all it is a guess. If Coutinho wasn't involved in last summers bids then, this summer you should have a new years budget plus the Coutinho money.
So the Swedish ponytail has admitted he never wanted to go to Man U and it's was all about the silly money they payed him. Zlatan Ibrahimovic: I wanted to join LA Galaxy before Man Utd move http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/43601423
