Wrong.
It’s 66% the figure you’ve quoted includes amortisation and was quoted by Marca
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kurtba...istory-of-sports-at-770-million/#4107e40b7e82
The last published figures came BEFORE the sale of Neymar btw, a sale that only went through due to their inability to refuse.
In short, you’re talking balls mate
Errrrmmm Marca is the paper of Madrid mateoh so you believe the marca headlines now do you
the ones designed to soothe the furrowed brows of the barca faithful?
I see you cannot deny the messi figures or the fact that all that neymar transfer fee and more went right out the door.
no problem mate.
http://www.marca.com/en/football/barcelona/2017/10/27/59f245d546163f605a8b4614.html
there you go another marca story
let me quote for you
"Aworld record budget may have been presented by Barcelona as they sum up their forecasts for 2017/18, but a big crack in the Catalan club's finances is only set to grow and requires 150 million euros of extra funding to cover over.
Typically, a football club should not be paying out more than 70 percent of its budget on player wages and it was only Neymar's 222m euro sale that prevented the Blaugrana from surpassing this precipice for last season's accounts.
In 2017/18, however, the forecast is that Barcelona's wages will take up a whopping 84 percent of the budget, leading to the boardroom scratching around for the necessary funds to cover the bill."
so.....
balls is it?
hmmmmmmm......
that club cannot afford to go buy greizmann for 100mil euros release and coutinho for 140mil without selling 7 or 8 players to reduce that wage bill and free up funds.
Errrrmmm Marca is the paper of Madrid mate
Try again
It’s anti Barca PR ffs, you were trying to portray the complete converseI see you've failed to deny a word of it
the REALITY of while you are trying this wind you've failed
the reailty is we are talking a FURTHER 250k per week to coutinho on this transfer and they simply cannot afford it until they clear out the dead wood.
And that brings me back full circle to the common sense approach says this will be done in june on January.
It’s anti Barca PR ffs, you were trying to portray the complete converse
I’ve posted the reality, that being Barca’s wages to turnover ratio was 66% BEFORE the Neymar sale, yours was 69% btw
You’ve bought the ‘Barca are skint’ bollocks, hook line and sinker
He even does a funny little dance when he scores.
It’s anti Barca PR ffs, you were trying to portray the complete converse
I’ve posted the reality, that being Barca’s wages to turnover ratio was 66% BEFORE the Neymar sale, yours was 69% btw
You’ve bought the ‘Barca are skint’ bollocks, hook line and sinker
You posted bollocks from Marca an anti Barca paper ffs, meanwhile I’ve posted the actual accounts not assumption based, biased, bullshit.do we really need to debate
WERE and ARE in terms of past and present tense.
As i said 80% of turnover not 69% i fail to see where you are pulling that number from . I just posted the barca projections as reported as a massive black hole in thier wage strucutre.
I've posted where that neymar money went to show WHY COMMON SENSE says its not available now.
Barca do NOT have the money. both wages and transfer fees to throw cash around without clearing the decks. there has been talk actually for YEARS of how the MSN forward line were costing them so much in wages they were struggling to keep up.
Messi is now the highest paid player on the planet, squarez and neymar were on about 275k per week or so. reports were dembele got something over 200k per week when he signed.
now you tell me one final time... if you can. just where barca are going to find the money to pay coutinho 250k a week and LFC 140mil this january without clearing out deadwood to free up wages and fees.
all i've said is common sense says barca need to clear the decks before this is happening. wheres the bullshit now?
I didn’t post anything sourced from Marca though?so what you posted sourced from marca is not bollocks though
hilarious.
honestly tobes just admit you got is badly wrong here.
