so do we actually have any real links to any players...
I mean are we still on about the same two or have we done anything to get a new player.
I mean are we still on about the same two or have we done anything to get a new player.
I don't see a problem with Chelsea, 1 game means **** all.
Van Dijk confronted about Liverpool interest
The Daily Express has an interesting story about Virgil van Dijk on their website today.
It’s reported that a Southampton fan spotted the defender in a restaurant and popped over to chat.
Posting as LeBizzier69 on the popular online SaintsWeb forum, the fan claimed that van Dijk went quiet when confronted about Liverpool’s interest.
The fan wrote: “Double V D has just been having dinner with three of his entourage a few tables down from us. Took daughter over to his table after she wrote “don’t go” on a napkin.
Seemed nice enough until I said he was too good to go to Liverpool. All went a bit quiet then. That virus cleared up fast
I agree, I seem to recall they had a bit of an iffy start last season....remind me how that went!
So someone interrupted while enjoying a meal with friends was unwilling to start discussing his career plans in public with a total stranger. Shocker.

They did pull a rabbit of the hat. They changed from a back 4 to a back 3. And never looked back.
I am not sure what major system change or player improvement they can carry out this time. In fact they have lost 2 key players: Costa and Matic.
So someone interrupted while enjoying a meal with friends was unwilling to start discussing his career plans in public with a total stranger. Shocker.
Look
I think they'd not have lost at all barring that red.
1. morata is better than costa but was benched
2. hazard is injured
3. pedro is injured
4. they cm replacement is half fit
5. rudiger needs to get used to prem.
Within a month?
their team will be back... but they could well have fallen off the title pace.
Right there. No way would Chelsea have expected to lose to Burnley (who only won once away all season) of all teams.
Chelsea will definitely be back. But IMO they are not stronger than they were last season. Only 2 teams have improved: the Manchester clubs. The others Chelsea, Spurs, Arsenal and LFC have stayed the same or become weaker.
Cheslea have IMO just changed personnel but i would be far more worried about their manager whining that i would about their team strength.
their first team is frankly still IMO better than citys. but.. i think their cohesion is gone... I really do.
Courtois
Azpi Luiz (shown up saturday) Rudiger (they will buy vvd)
Moses Kante Bakayko Alonso
Pedro Morata Hazard
Like... its an immense side... IF they want to play... drinkwater won't improve that, van dijk would be interesting...
but its just the way it is... they have not quite the squad.
Spurs are the same.. great first 11 imo... if a little weak with son (who i think is a runner not a real star) but take out kane and it all goes tits up.
City have lots and lots of players but they look soft to me... they can be dynamic but i think sides with resolution can get at them. CB is still the issue there.. they should buy VVD.
Then utd.. they are stronger and taller and more brutish than ever of course.. but mkhitaryan and mata add the needed guile. they have the game mourinho wants to beat up the bottom half and get the results v the top half to put them in the title race. they have the squad mostly to compete on all fronts
Then arsneal? remains to be seen who stays and who goes... once thats decided then they could be a strong outfit... soft as well.
At this moment, I make City the stand out favorites. They have the attacking force of last season but seem to have improve significantly on their defence.
At this moment, I make City the stand out favorites. They have the attacking force of last season but seem to have improve significantly on their defence.
Look at the players who didn't play, Sane, Sterling, Gungodan, Mendy and Toure. Thats the depth that wins the title. And they still have players like Bony, Mangala, Delph, Roberts and Nasri, who they can either use as back up or just sell.At this moment, I make City the stand out favorites. They have the attacking force of last season but seem to have improve significantly on their defence.
One of the few positives I could take from that game was the fact that we could still create and score goals (one a real peach of a team goal) without Coutinho. Obviously I'm not saying he doesn't improve us, I'm just thinking that perhaps he isn't the great loss we are fearing.You're right - the defending did let us down but everyone can clearly see the deficiencies in midfield. Had he been playing, maybe he could have helped us keep more possession and dominate the game.
they should be yes but i think come winter they might just find they are still a bit soft. they actually played all 3 cbs v brighton but kompany is THE main man.
everyone wants to go 3 at the back now... I can see some team ripping the ****e out of these sides with deep crossing shortly
I think city will rip up sides when playing well.. huge pace etc... wet tuesday night (not at stoke) lets see..
I think cheslea cannot afford to have a bad 3/4 games here at the start. nobody can... ahem LFC
LFC must win v palace. palace were wide open v huddersfield.
Look at the players who didn't play, Sane, Sterling, Gungodan, Mendy and Toure. Thats the depth that wins the title. And they still have players like Bony, Mangala, Delph, Roberts and Nasri, who they can either use as back up or just sell.
Its between the two Manchester clubs, and its no surprise that they're the two biggest spenders this year