That may well happen. He is not required by us but has value in the marketplace. Unless Klopp wants him as back up and plays him occasionaly he's not going to gain in value by January or next summer. I guess we're hoping Palace blink first.
See, this post is a good pointer to why you should read before commenting There has been no mention of anyone getting "robbed", I have said that we sell far too cheap at times though. It may be a good thing though with first team squad players because we never seem to have anyone hanging around like a bad smell for long
Dont you know the game is to grossly exaggerate what you said and also twist it. Hmmmm lets see... utd bad smells.... Anderson stunk. Depay is currently smelling like last weeks fish.... Kleberson anyone? What you make back 10% of the fee... worse than balotelli seeing we at least pulled in a loan fee. In fact shockingly for benteke whos a ok you dont suit the new manager... utd have done far worse havent they? Then of course theres poor old hargreaves the ultimate sick note.. how much you lose there?
Oooh yes..Anderson...26m for a guy to sit on beach eating Mcdonalds and away on a free cause no one could afford his dinner bill.
Yep, he sat on the bench and occasionally came on the field to play. We did let him go as a free because he was not good enough for us, now you are getting the point of my posts. You deem a player not good enough to even get on the bench yet demand that he will remain a spectator unless someone gives you all your money back This is a player that is more than good enough with a manager who is prepared to use him or with players intelligent enough to change their approach when he is on the field, instead you will have him waste a portion of his career because of greed. Accept you have made a mistake (like other clubs do) and give him a chance to move on.
Lol...that's a version of events...you let him go because he pretty much ran out his contract...you tried selling him on many occasions...the fact that he was too fat (left to rot) to take, well his and your efforts in training can be questioned ..you said earlier you didn't let them rot on the bench you released them in some weird nice gesture for the good of their careers...he's an example of one you did exactly the opposite. ...you had him from 2008 to 2015!!! Highlighted: you are contradicting yourself mate...if you see this, (as do many of us remember) so do other managers that want his attributes...we and obviously our manager are not saying he's **** we are saying he doesn't fit us and we have 4 ahead of him who fit us better. Our price tag when bought and when selling is our opinion that he's good enough if prepared to set up to suit him: New manager isnt preoared to. Aston Villa when selling thought he was worth that because he showed it. He hasn't lost a leg or 15 stone while with us...so valuation is correct for how good a striker he is for those that will use him to his strengths. Your line of attack would have made much more sense if you'd just stated "why the **** did you buy him"....we all agree. Your wum is falling apart mate...it always happens if you try to sustain it too long.
Slight under estination of the amountvof games anderson waddled around in there diego. Your attempts to forget you said your lads dont hang round havent worked. Ive proved your just waffling and you know it. Tryi g to square the circle by getti g back to benteke is no fun. I think we should discuss kleberson some... now howd that one go? 20mil away back when 20mil meant something... sold for 2?
In fact Mito you could argue we are protecting Tekkers reputation by not playing him rather than hurting it. We could keep putting him in, he sticks out like a sore thumb..lumbers around 2 seconds behind everyone else and people start to doubt. As it stands...most clubs agree we just ****ed by buying him at all as everyone could see he wouldn't fit. They all remember the striker he is rather than a poor sod struggling around game after game. Us putting a 32M tag on him says we agree it was our fault not his.
He was **** and we sold him for less than we paid, seems about right when people **** up. Your strange obsession with Kleberson is highlighting your lack of understanding in this debate
Log in in the morning hoping for good news.... Instantly disappointed you've been talking ****e all night, again!
I bet he won't be taking her out again, unless he likes that sort of thing, Not as bad as feared, apparently.
Liverpool are reportedly considering a move for Porto centre back Bruno Martins Indi. The 24-year-old can function as either a centre-back or left-back. According to the Daily Mirror, Martins Indi's versatility appeals to Klopp. Martins Indi currently has two years left to run on his contract. He joined Porto from Feyenoord two years ago. Source: Daily Express
Yup.... any how now that weve destroyed diego lets move on. Mourinho helping lfc by getting mad mario a move to wolves. Brilliant.... prob negotiate us a 5mil fee while hes at it.
