Great business thenHow much has been wasted on his wages for the last two seasons
Great business thenHow much has been wasted on his wages for the last two seasons
Just another expensive ck up by the owners imo
Oh, we hadn't noticed.Love my club just don't like the way it's being run thanks for asking
shocking isn't it£8m we paid for Caulker for 48 games in 3 (?) seasons. That's £166,000 a game excluding wages. Cheers Harold.
Though to be fair I'm sure we have had even worse value for money and many other clubs have as well. Just goes to show how important having a professional back room team who really check players out before signings is, and it becomes a vicious circle when you have a headstrong manager who thinks a couple of calls to his mates is all you need to do and you can't afford a proper back room staff anyway. The smaller clubs end up taking a good chunk of the risk for the bigger ones, helping them fix their relative positions in stone. At some stage the financial arse will fall out of this game as a result because it's getting less and less competitive, and less and less interesting as a result. Most of us don't really care which of Chelsea, Utd, City, Liverpool or Spurs win the league, as long as it's not Chelsea. Leicester was a spectacular one off.shocking isn't it
Most of us don't really care which of Chelsea, Utd, City, Liverpool or Spurs win the league, as long as it's not Chelsea. Leicester was a spectacular one off.
Love my club just don't like the way it's being run thanks for asking
£8m we paid for Caulker for 48 games in 3 (?) seasons. That's £166,000 a game excluding wages. Cheers Harold.
He knew this was going to happen did he?Sanctioned by the chairman
Average player whom we payed well over the odds as usual next question?He knew this was going to happen did he?
Was widely applauded as a great signing when we made it on these forums. No doubt you were saying the opposite were you?
Average player whom we payed well over the odds as usual next question?