Transfer Embargo

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

What’s gonna happen

  • Temporary blip

  • Complete ****ing collapse

  • It’ll all be ok

  • Relegation


Results are only viewable after voting.
Some on X seem to think that the EFL blocking us from signing McBurnie based on our salary offer means they have imposed the Salary Cost Management Protocol on us, which usually only applies to League One and League Two clubs.

Either that or the EFL have to ratify every free agent or loan transfer we make under the fee restriction on a case-by-case basis.
 
The Man City thing is such a can of worms because people seem to be convinced that they're guilty already and the question is just about how big the punishment is.

The reality is they haven't yet been found guilty. If they are found guilty of all of the charges and yet the punishment isn't severe, then that would seem outrageous and people would rightly be annoyed. If they are found guilty of only a small number and then get an appropriately minor punishment, people will still be annoyed and will say it's a stitch up, even though it will really just be a reflection of a thorough legal process. Obviously there is the argument that their expensive lawyers may have helped them get off with some of the charges also.

I think some people think that the PL will go easy on them, but from what I've read and heard on the subject, the PL are actually really keen to come down hard on them, and it's just a question of whether they can successfully prove them guilty on all of the charges. I think many people don't realise that the PL are the ones bringing the charges against them, and that it would be a defeat for them if Man City get off lightly.
You dont end up with a comedy prop scroll list of charges unless you're crooked. Maybe they're not guilty of all of them, but there must be enough evidence to justify plenty of them, and if they're guilty they need a suitable punishment otherwise English football is dead.
 
You dont end up with a comedy prop scroll list of charges unless you're crooked. Maybe they're not guilty of all of them, but there must be enough evidence to justify plenty of them, and if they're guilty they need a suitable punishment otherwise English football is dead.

Apparently, they will be cleared of all charges except one: refusing to cooperate with the investigation. That charge alone will get them a meagre points deduction and a hefty fine but the expectation is they will be found not guilty on all the charges relating to financial doping and paying people off the books.

It’s also reported they will bring forward legal action against the media, pundits and even popular YouTubers for defamation unless they issue a public apology <laugh>
 
Some on X seem to think that the EFL blocking us from signing McBurnie based on our salary offer means they have imposed the Salary Cost Management Protocol on us, which usually only applies to League One and League Two clubs.

Either that or the EFL have to ratify every free agent or loan transfer we make under the fee restriction on a case-by-case basis.
I posted on the other thread, Baz seemed to think it was about us working with the efl on all deals to keep them happy. If we can find a way to do that then the restrictions could be lifted
 
Some on X seem to think that the EFL blocking us from signing McBurnie based on our salary offer means they have imposed the Salary Cost Management Protocol on us, which usually only applies to League One and League Two clubs.

Either that or the EFL have to ratify every free agent or loan transfer we make under the fee restriction on a case-by-case basis.

The appeal process is more of a dialogue aimed at establishing we are on a sustainable footing. It's not cost salary management protocol at all, it's simply a case of the club/Acun proving we can meet future obligations. I think we can safely assume that paying a new signing 40k a week when we already owe 20m in scheduled transfer payments, against the backdrop of already missed payments and late wages isn't something that would help satisfy the EFL that we can meet future commitments sustainably.
 
Last edited:
Apparently, they will be cleared of all charges except one: refusing to cooperate with the investigation. That charge alone will get them a meagre points deduction and a hefty fine but the expectation is they will be found not guilty on all the charges relating to financial doping and paying people off the books.

It’s also reported they will bring forward legal action against the media, pundits and even popular YouTubers for defamation unless they issue a public apology <laugh>

If you haven't done anything wrong then why not just cooperate with the investigation
 
Wrexham have ryan renolds and rob macc

Swansea now have snoopdog and luka modric

Whens brad pitt coming to city
 
Some on X seem to think that the EFL blocking us from signing McBurnie based on our salary offer means they have imposed the Salary Cost Management Protocol on us, which usually only applies to League One and League Two clubs.

Either that or the EFL have to ratify every free agent or loan transfer we make under the fee restriction on a case-by-case basis.
Maybe they were trying to be kind and told us he wasnt worth 40k a week...<laugh>
 
You dont end up with a comedy prop scroll list of charges unless you're crooked. Maybe they're not guilty of all of them, but there must be enough evidence to justify plenty of them, and if they're guilty they need a suitable punishment otherwise English football is dead.
A lot of it is legal wording & definition of the rules, did they break rules or bend them?
Same could be said of Chelsea, for me, what they’re doing is blatant, but they’re not even in a conversation about breaking rules, because the rules are being bent.
 
Some on X seem to think that the EFL blocking us from signing McBurnie based on our salary offer means they have imposed the Salary Cost Management Protocol on us, which usually only applies to League One and League Two clubs.

Either that or the EFL have to ratify every free agent or loan transfer we make under the fee restriction on a case-by-case basis.
Or we were never really in for him as we couldn’t afford him & it was just the usual spin on signings, before we trot out the ones with Turkish connections.

You must log in or register to see images