Transfer Embargo

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

What’s gonna happen

  • Temporary blip

  • Complete ****ing collapse

  • It’ll all be ok

  • Relegation


Results are only viewable after voting.
Coaches wouldnt have been having a pint in the hilton if we were ****ed

You must log in or register to see images


Even though they were surrounded by the undead and he had to kill Phillip (sorry), they still went to the pub. Britain played football against the Germans in No Man's Land during WW1's Christmas Armistice; just because everything is ****ed around you doesn't mean you can't enjoy a nice cold beer.
 
Id be worried if it was wetherspoons
They're going up in the world, the last time my brother and his partner were in Hull they stayed at the hotel and apartments in Park Street, City coaching staff were also staying there. :emoticon-0138-think

The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine.
 
Does anybody know then if there's any truth in Westerlo happy for no payments to be made for 18 months? To me it sounds bad for both clubs. If we do this multuliple times which is highly likely the plan. We'll be hit with lots of payments all at once! and Westerlo, receiving zero of the rumoured €9M for so many months. I don't know how it can work
 
Does anybody know then if there's any truth in Westerlo happy for no payments to be made for 18 months? To me it sounds bad for both clubs. If we do this multuliple times which is highly likely the plan. We'll be hit with lots of payments all at once! and Westerlo, receiving zero of the rumoured €9M for so many months. I don't know how it can work

If we do manage to pull off some moves that way, the 23/24 boom or bust January will have dropped off the FFP 3 year cycle, so presuming Acun could actually finance it, we'd technically be alright in that regard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DazzaHatty
I think Ryan Reynolds is incredibly wealthy. He co-owned a mobile service provider for $1.25bn and took $300m. he sold his gin brand for $600m. He makes $30-40m per film and his films have grossed $6.5bn. His profile alone allows him access to much bigger pots of money too so if you think of the income he can generate for Wrexham so he doesn’t have to put in his own cash - the united airlines deal alone is worth $6m a season. That’s before you look at all the other links. Wrexham’s 23/24 shirt reveal had something like 55m views on YouTube.

I can see Wrexham being a big deal for quite a while
From what I’ve seen, Reynolds and McElhenny haven’t actually plowed that much (in the grand scheme of things) of their own cash in. They’ve utilised Reynolds brand exceptionally well and not ****ed about in getting a great back room team in to run the business
 
From what I’ve seen, Reynolds and McElhenny haven’t actually plowed that much (in the grand scheme of things) of their own cash in. They’ve utilised Reynolds brand exceptionally well and not ****ed about in getting a great back room team in to run the business

They've certainly put a lot of their own money in at each level, but they've benefitted from on-field success so that it hasn't blown up in their face. Yes they've been able to leverage their band to boost commercial revenue, but when they were non-league and in League Two they were certainly on the hook for a lot of it. They've now sold a percentage of the club for a huge profit which has helped them recoup a lot of their investment.
 
Still makes no sense to me.
-> "Hull Live understands there’s an expectation amongst the club’s hierarchy that they will have the three-window punishment reduced on appeal. City have 14 days to lodge their appeal and will be heard by a hastily convened independent disciplinary panel".
Surely if the club had this agreement (or credit note) with Villa then they would be expecting to have the punishment lifted altogether, not just reduced as they would believe they've done nothing wrong? Or maybe that's inaccurate journalism?
It really needs the club to come out and say something meaningful to the fans to properly explain what's going on, but maybe they can't until the appeal is heard?