Transfer Embargo
- Thread starter Chazz Rheinhold
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Mike White conversation with Acun:
You must log in or register to see images
Last edited:
-> No it doesn't. Re read it.
-> The HDM Article states exactly that. Perhaps they've made it up but I am going off of their reporting. The embargo was a result of the Barry fee the restriction of paying fees is for late payments. Are you saying you think it's them who made it up?
"City are no longer under a transfer embargo after settling an outstanding debt with Aston Villa surrounding Louie Barry’s loan in January, but the punishment for failure to make payments within a 30-day period stands..
The Tigers are alleged to have missed more than 30 days of payments to football creditors in the past 12 months, with the fixed punishment for that being a restriction on buying players for three transfer windows, which takes the club until January 2027."
---------
Yes, 'the failure to make payments within a 30 day period' is the failure to make payments to Villa!!
See also Mike White's update on his conversation with Acun.
-> The HDM Article states exactly that. Perhaps they've made it up but I am going off of their reporting. The embargo was a result of the Barry fee the restriction of paying fees is for late payments. Are you saying you think it's them who made it up?
"City are no longer under a transfer embargo after settling an outstanding debt with Aston Villa surrounding Louie Barry’s loan in January, but the punishment for failure to make payments within a 30-day period stands..
The Tigers are alleged to have missed more than 30 days of payments to football creditors in the past 12 months, with the fixed punishment for that being a restriction on buying players for three transfer windows, which takes the club until January 2027."
---------
Yes, 'the failure to make payments within a 30 day period' is the failure to make payments to Villa!!
See also Mike White's update on his conversation with Acun.
They're changing the green ****, it's going to be, orange, green, and white.
The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine.
They're changing the green ****, it's going to be, orange, green, and white.
The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine.
Jared Dublins idea?
I wonder if Acun has some paperwork to alleviate the issue with money owed to the local suppliers and an invoice for the new training and match day kits.
Kit Man must be tearing his hair out, when it arrives he will have a lot of work on catching up with everything.
I once tried giving Ric a Bhoys badge, very surprisingly he turned it down.
The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine.
Turned it down..I once tried giving Ric a Bhoys badge, very surprisingly he turned it down.
The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine.
I've still got the burn scar from where you placed it in my palm.
And that ungrateful git Cityzen turned his Norwich badge down.
The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine.
City had outstanding debt to a football creditor, Villa, so had transfer embargo placed. They've now settled with Villa so embargo lifted.
But also, City missed 30 day deadline for payment (to Villa) so have had 3 window restriction placed.
Acun and Villa owner apparently have close relationship so probably not an issue, but EFL say rules are rules. Acun says there is a paper trail and will get punishment reduced/lifted.
I've not seen any confirmation of any other creditors involved in the process so far, unless anyone on here can enlighten us?
But also, City missed 30 day deadline for payment (to Villa) so have had 3 window restriction placed.
Acun and Villa owner apparently have close relationship so probably not an issue, but EFL say rules are rules. Acun says there is a paper trail and will get punishment reduced/lifted.
I've not seen any confirmation of any other creditors involved in the process so far, unless anyone on here can enlighten us?
Luckily for John Eyre he hasn't had hair for years!
A hairless fly, how novel.
The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine.
Think someone mentioned money was still owed from January transfer window, and so I think people believed that could be Blackpool. However, if they were still owed money then the original transfer embargo would be still in place, so that doesn't tally up for me.
It could be true that other football creditors are involved, but I haven't seen any clear evidence/confirmation of this and it appears to be speculation.
And that ungrateful git Cityzen turned his Norwich badge down.
The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine.
And, as my son and grandson told you, they have never,ever heard me mention Norwich. Son also told you the only other club whose result I look for and that goes back to before I had ever been to a City match.
No GFAW it says they are separate and one was resolved and the other isn't.
I basing my opinion on what the article says. If subsequent articles say otherwise, and I hope they do, then I'll base my opinion on that.
What he said to Mike White doesn't address this point but hopefully what Acun said is true.