I might just skip trying to work out any logic in the voting patterns today (If I'm alive tomorrow that is). My head might explode
I'm sorry, I don't speak Scouse. This time in English.I think the voters that didn't influence the final table are required to change their vote to make them influential to determine their guilt in said vote prior to the paper fingering them as coward voters in a second protected vote for mafia scummers. Am I close?
I might just skip trying to work out any logic in the voting patterns today (If I'm alive tomorrow that is). My head might explode
And seeing as you highlighted my reply, that makes ACS the more obvious of the two left (above) for suspicion
You are the logical target when looking at voting patterns. You're late switch and edit won't go unnoticed
As shaggy would say 'It wasn't me'. It was DPP
