Where Nigel Pearson's Bristol City are predicted to finish in the Championship table It's set to be a year of transition but the data is currently showing that a top half finish still looks tough to achieve https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/sport...nigel-pearsons-bristol-city-predicted-6025959 We are predicted to finish 18th...
Agreed. I would also add the return of injured players (Weimann, O’Dowda, DaSilva, Williams, Martin) who WERE in the squad under the previous incumbents but unavailable through injury.
R&W Not sure about DaSilva at all. Good going forward and lots of ability but he's a genuine liability when defending. Haven't seen O'Dowda this season.
Weimann has definitely added a fresh dimension to the teams work rate v last season, Williams in the few games he has played has looked great, and can be a standout player at this level if he keeps that up. O'Dowda has flattered to deceive in the 2 games I have seen, and agree about DaSilva.
4 points worse than last season and we twice won at home!! I did say, some do get carried away though, not naming names!!
over the past few yeas this or similar sites have had similar forcasts and been quite near the mark at seasons end! but they tend to publish a table every so many games to revise the out come, [ I do 5th 7th 9th 11th and 16th, hoping it is 8h 8a ] RODS table last season top 6 123 points this season 128 pts all square top 12, but this season top 18 5 pts better off [ adjusted with Derby 12 pts not deducted, haven't got bottom 6 teams pts to hand... ] so slightly better quality yes but look at the home and away results …… last season …. away points 13 of the 20! …. also ….this season 5 home games 6 away games! [ same split both years ] but won 4 away lost 2 … 12 of the 16…... drew 4 home lost 1 [ difference is lost 2 away only 1 home, and of course not won at home ] === POOR home record is to regular!!!!
Forgot to double copy this bit even whan it was highlighted in a bright colour....We are predicted to finish 18th... Sometimes you do make me smile.
You can be very selective about statistics. This season we have lost twice as many away matches than home matches 2 to 1 and conceded over twice as many goals 9 to 4. We actually have the 4th best home defensive record in the championship.
absolutely right … in certain competitive sports a panel of judges is often of a number up to say 9 and top and bottom or even top2 and bottom are disregarded then rest count...……… GD I never like that as a deciding factor unless anomalies are taken into consideration [ i know at present they are not! ] Should a team miss out on relegation or promotion due to 1 goal difference its sad [ for them ] but say they got beaten by a team that won because they got a penalty later turned over as a dive is that fair??? The stats show GD .. A team won by default has xx points etc etc I ask myself why run something 20,000 …. [ presumably on x games in a table of past results? ] how many "different" stats can there be that actually has an influence? I suppose you could say Matt Smith v Jay DaSilva is one ….
Interesting and spot on. One of the big (rational) criticisms of LJ was that he set out NOT to lose at home, rather than to take a risk and attack and maybe win. NP needs to take a risk and go for it.
