Watkins is a different kind of player but he's top draw himself. He's done it for a few years now.
It isn't even a comparison, you know it.
Watkins is a different kind of player but he's top draw himself. He's done it for a few years now.
It isn't even a comparison, you know it.
How many goals did they score the last 2 seasons?
I'm not interested in debating it, if you honestly think they are equal then you don't know much about football.
It's like saying Burn is as good as Botman.
Numbers say otherwise....
Isak league goals to games since joining..32 goals in 55 games.
Watkins league goals to games in that time..36 goals in 78 games.
Do the math.
You must log in or register to see images
Watkins is a good striker..Isak is an elite striker.
Both are just different but both are top strikers it's really that simple.
Doesn't mean they are equal though.
Isak and Haaland are both top strikers, but Haaland is better..
I hate to say it but I agree with Chaos. They are very different players, but if a striker is judged on his goals, then you have to say that there is not much between them.I'm not interested in debating it, if you honestly think they are equal then you don't know much about football.
I hate to say it but I agree with Chaos. They are very different players, but if a striker is judged on his goals, then you have to say that there is not much between them.
Watkins lead the line better than Isak, is much better at putting pressure on defenders and is very good in the air. Isak is more clinical.
Lol, I'm in agreement. It's not even particularly controversial. I mean, I'd be delighted if we signed Watkins as he's an excellent player.It's arguable and certainly comparable