Tonight

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
littleDinosaurLuke said:
NSIS, there has been a statement through lawyers denying the claims
Click to expand...


There was a statement from Fergie's lawyers at the end stating that he was friends with Mr Sim, but that he wouldn't loan players on his request.

There was nothing denying the claims.
Unless I've missed something?
 
Don't be ridiculous, Luke. From what I can see, none of this constitutes anything added to the brief verbal statements that were in last nights programme.

One more time, if there is no substance behind Robsons' and Slippery Joe's claims, then where are the official denials.
 
If Robson is an employee of Man Utd then there is a case for the club to answer.
 
littleDinosaurLuke said:
But the claims have been denied, which was the point disputed earlier.

Why is it necessary for the claims to be commented on further?

Other managers were implicated (and by inference their clubs too). When is 'Arry making a statemen

The programme produced evidence against Sim and Robson re multiple club ownership. There is no case for anyone else to answer.
Click to expand...

Now you're just being totally ridiculous. NO official statement of denial has been issued by either Ferguson, or Man Utd. Why???

You're attempts to deflect, by trying to implicate others, including Redknapp (whose name was mentioned briefly, just once) and to try and make comparisons between that, and the situation involving Ferguson and Robson, are just laughable.
 
I'm sorry, Luke, but if sombody made, what I knew, were unfounded allegations like that against me on national T.V. I would put out an immediate rebuttal, and demand an immediate withdrawal of the allegations - Why doesn't Ferguson?? To those of us not wearing red & white tinted specs, his silence merely condemns him.
 
Comparing the scandal to HR's tax is a bit flimsy Luke, the evidence is yet to be revealed, or CPS balls up! We on the other hand have recorded video footage...not quite the same is it?
 
Redknapp, however, was not caught on camera having cosy meals with Robson's known associate - Slippery Joe. Robson, the person making these allegations, is the former captain of Man Utd - not Spurs. There is no evidence that Rednapp even KNOWS these people. There is, however, plenty of evidence that Ferguson DOES.
Am I getting through the red & white haze that you see through, yet, Luke. Or is it totally impenetrable???
 
Redknapp could easily get out of any implicated wrongdoing by either suggesting that we loan out a lot of players at Spurs, which is true or by suggesting that he was following Ferguson's lead.

He'd always be clever enough to use a buffer, anyway.
Kevin Bond springs to mind.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back