I think you need to go and look at all Piskies posts in this thread. Jamrag and others have made false accusations (once again) and Jamrag has avoided answering a question because he trapped himself. Nowhere was Piskie defending anyone or attacking anyone. It's all bullshit from the cry babies, just like when Jamrag was banned and they all blamed Piskie - rather pathetic to be honest. Peace
I've had my own run-ins with Piskie by PM and can assure you that they are not anywhere near the level of respect or equanimity you and I have shared on this thread my friend. Thus and with an observation that his approach in the forum is on the basis of more of his same time-honoured style, I feel it best and this place for me more enjoyable, if I can simply read and respond to the posts of my friends. Stay well friend
Not half as pathetic as all the sob sisters on this forum crying to the mods about Jayram via PM because they don't agree with his views. A bit like children running behind mummy's legs when they start a fight with a sibling that they can't finish!
Oh dear - a pair of rather pathetic posts. One (Jamrag) trapped by his own bullshit and trying desperately to wriggle out of answering a direct question and the other (sucker sucker) unable to say anything enlightening, but instead attempts to belittle others in a futile attempt at defending his indefensible group leader. C'mon Jamrag, answer Piskies question. I dare ya....no, I double dare ya LMFAO
WHOO!!! NAME CALLING TIME!!!! You're pathetic...no YOU'RE pathetic...no YOU'RE pathetic...no YOU'RE pathetic!!! I haven't had this much fun since I was in Primary School.
Firstly, Bonstar, doesn't your post categorize you as an internet tough guy as well? Half Full, kudos on the sucker sucker pun. Indefensible? Jayram is merely expressing an opinion about a football team and as is your right, you can disagree and debate with it. I'm not sure why you think he's done anything that's indefensible. As I said before, which is the more pathetic? Having strong opinions on something and expressing it or crying to the mods because 'the big kids won't play fair, whaaa!'
Whether the first is pathetic would depend upon the opinion they are expressing. The 2nd is pathetic in my opinion. Any more questions?
Yep! That's all I do. Bully bully bully. I go round calling people names and being mean to folks on Internet Forums to improve my self worth and raise my self esteem. I'm a bad, bad man. In my day-job, I'm a Ninja Having strong opinions on something is fine. Have a word with yourself and think about these questions: Would Jayram have been banned if he hadn't broken the rules? Why do we have rules? His behaviour has been markedly improved since his return. Appears to be slipping a bit again today with some name calling, but in general he's been much more amenable.
In which case, in future, rather than responding, use the referral system to notify the mods. Then you'll stay squeeky-clean. Responding to personal attacks with personal attacks does break the rules.
Bon The outrage that followed Jayram's exclusion may reflect that the majority of us felt the action was quite unwarranted and unsubstantiated. If you do look at Jayram's posts you will see that as has been attested, while he may be accused to have responded, he certainly started no fight. Perhaps he should not have taken the bait but I suggest with respect that it could also be taken that it is those who baited him who may be at fault. It seems too that some are happy to start fights but are unable to finish them. One may even go as far as to say that in providing his arguments, debating if you like, he chose to end the fights which he didn't start. Some may not agree but food for thought eh?
Absolutely. I have no problem with debate, I have no issue with anyone's opinions, provided they are respectfully expressed. It's the insults that I can't abide. The constant necessity to label someone "stupid" because they don't agree - from both "sides" of the apparent "divide." It grates on me that people are nasty to each other without cause, and constant bickering on threads ruins the discussion. As it has done here, and on this one, I am definitely to blame!
It would be good if one day we could have peace on this board. Think winning again may help Cheerio 4 now
It doesn't matter what PISKIE posted - it was more than likely some nonsense about why we are well placed to do well and why we are not in a crisis and why the manager is great. Much like I am guaranteed to read some drivel when I see your name associated with a post, I pretty much come to expect certain things from certain people.
Cry babies ??? You donut ! Do you know WHY Jayram was banned ? Because sheeple like you complained to the mods Wipe that egg off your face chap.
Go and read Piskies posts - I promise that there aren't any long words to confuse you ...and you know who complained about him do you? Thought not. Talking about egg on face - in your case, more like 'eggs' supplied by Jamrag
Bonstar UTTER RUBBISH bloke You are moving far too closely to the dark side of the force !! 1) Jayram was banned because the In Arsene We Trust gang complained about him, it was sheer weight of numbers of the complaints - as confirmed by the mod who actually banned him. So these dudes picked an argument they couldn't win then cried offto the mods 2) This internet hard man thing, why is that ? Because someone calls someone a fool or muppet, that makes them an internet hard man ? Get real.
So tell me this and, I have no desire to turn this into a long cocky argument or debate this is simply a statement; If Jayram was responding to name calling by name calling, why was it that only Jayram was banned ?
