he plays as strikers too .. when England send long balls to Rooney in brazil game, he was going for it and challenging defenders for the high balls trying to keep possession while walcott was running away from that challenge and staying at the flank.. it make england play with 2 strikers in central area when needed .. this what made england too mobile and he offer more psychical side than having Walcott/Lennon.. are you planning to play both at right side then?
Whereas Welbeck is a natural left sided attacker...as demonstrated by the ****e outside of the right foot finish.
I agree.. Young is the best at the moment at the Left flank meanwhile, with England playing 3 in the mid , this will leave England with one striker if we play with 2 real wingers, it will make England kind toothless upfront .. and another key area we will miss without Welbeck is that i feel England will be weaker physically to challenge for balls with defenders in the central areas .. in the other hand, England will be most effective at the left side if they played Young, and England will definitely win more fouls/penalties
How will it make England toothless? O wait England should go back to 4-4-2 and really dominate the opposition
This would be my preferred England team Hart Jones Ferdinand Smalling Cole Cleverley Powell Carrick Welbeck Rooney Young
is easy, you play with one striker, your chances are reduced to score unless England go back to 442 with 2 in mid if you want to play Young with Walcott in the flanks am interested to know what formation is ideal for you, just out of curiosity.. are you planning to play Rooney alone upfront?
We will get dominated in midfield and won't be able to support the strikers.... Did you watch the Euros? England were shocking.
