No I don't play games, I just want to know what something I'm involved with is being accused of. I assume you're talking about the Supporters' Trust, or maybe even CTWD. Saying that we (or they) have been misleading is a strong claim and if you're going to make that claim you need to be able to back it up. Again if you prefer not to that's fine but you shouldn't make the accusation. The same would go for me and my accusation that Allam is a liar; I've backed that up and will continue to do so.
I didn't say anyone specific. The assumptions are all yours. I've pointed out where you're being wrong and misleading and that the daft game you're trying to play adds nothing to the deabate.
Mwahaha Yes I'd confirmed it was true, but well done getting the photographic evidence Quite neat as well
I love knowing that he has to walk past that every day. I also love the image of someone walking by, noticing drying concrete, knowing it's Allam's house and just being compelled. I hope it was someone on their own who rushed home to tell their family about it.
I suspect if it bothered him that much he'd have it redone. As he hasn't (and I think he has the cash to do it) so he ain't that fussed. I think you need to get out more, just imo.
I just can't stand the **** and what he's done and doing to my club. He bullies people into getting his own way and when challenged he goes to ridiculous lengths to spite those who he deems to have crossed him by disagreeing. On top of all that, he does a lot of it in secret and so people still think the world of him. In the future when he's gone we'll probably laugh about these times but in the meantime, any minor cause of irritation to him, or a bit of dissent he can't do anything about just cheers me up a bit.
my thoughts are; -a big pat on the back to the concrete graffiti artist -Lammy aught to think about purchasing a tin of Kiwi mid-tan boot polish
Arent you living a complete lie? You've got yourself on the committee of an organisation that has a mantra of "No to the name change but fully support the Allams" Yet its clear you do not believe or want that at all? Is it difficult to compromise your firmly held belief?
The members of the committee have varying opinions on the owners, it's perfectly reasonable for some to hold stronger views than others. It's not really true to say we're 'fully supportive of the Allams', we think much of what they've done is disgraceful and though CTWD only campaigned for the name change and were complimentary to the owners beyond that, HCST have been far more critical in their submission for the second name change application.
A part of the problem in pointing anything out is that the same username can sometimes talk as though they're the trust, and when asked say that they're only posting a personal view. That to me is misleading, especially as the claim is the trust is not anti-Allam, despite the committee members on here being exactly that.
Id love to know which Trust committee members are fully supportive of the owners. I bet that is a short list. Of 0.
'Fully support the Allams' was the phrase used and there's much that's happened over the past year that we don't support at all. The second name change application, the re-branding by stealth, the evictions without consultation(both of them), the use of the ASI money and the contempt shown to the fans generally. Why on earth would a group that represents fans, be supportive of all that?
