1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Time for a change in formation

Discussion in 'Hull City' started by allowentry, Aug 31, 2014.

  1. allowentry

    allowentry Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    1,731
    Likes Received:
    1,138
    Time to ditch the 3-5-2 and go 4-4-2 or 4-2-3-1

    We looked a different team after 60 mins and certainly after we scored.

    Always more confident with Rosie in the team, slightly worrying is Curtis what was up with him and subbed for tactical reasons.
     
    #1
  2. Quill

    Quill Bastard

    Joined:
    May 23, 2012
    Messages:
    40,719
    Likes Received:
    13,311
    He wasn't subbed for tactical reasons, despite what was said. He didn't look 100% when he came off, looked like he picked up a slight knock.
     
    #2
  3. TurkeyTeeth™

    TurkeyTeeth™ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2014
    Messages:
    3,341
    Likes Received:
    1,750
    Well done... you've found the magic formula. On that basis we shouldn't play Hudds or Davies for the rest of the season cos we were crap before they went off.

    Hmmmm.....
     
    #3
  4. allowentry

    allowentry Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    1,731
    Likes Received:
    1,138
    FFS we looked different with 4 at the back. Nothing wrong with changing formation and i never said it was a magic formula.
     
    #4
  5. CityRMD

    CityRMD Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2013
    Messages:
    310
    Likes Received:
    153
    Have to agree, not sure if Dawson took to 3 CBs at all. Maybe he'll settle in and Bruce does love this formation, but we looked far more comfortable with rosie protecting elmo and allowing him to move further up the pitch.
     
    #5
  6. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    108,521
    Likes Received:
    67,384
    Personally, I think we always look better with four at the back.

    Though that might change with Chester, Dawson and Davies playing together.
     
    #6
  7. CMPUNK

    CMPUNK Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2013
    Messages:
    621
    Likes Received:
    4
    The formation we are playing at the moment is just not working.
     
    #7
  8. Spanish Tiger

    Spanish Tiger Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2014
    Messages:
    124
    Likes Received:
    5
    I dont think Davis was suited to playing outside of his central role he didnt look at home there at all. imo we didnt really get going untril the hour mark and I dont take all this we played on Thursday crap they are a fit bunch of lads and that wouldnt have worried them they have had a good 3 days rest so no point in shouting about the Thursday game.
     
    #8
  9. Spook

    Spook Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2014
    Messages:
    5,790
    Likes Received:
    1,178
    Close this thread, mods.

    We're not allowed to criticise the team or the tactics, according to some posters.
     
    #9
  10. Steven Toast

    Steven Toast Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    23,264
    Likes Received:
    16,352
    We played 3-5-2 for the first 2 games and there was nothing wrong with it.

    I don't think it's a bad formation, but we don't seem to adapt (something Phil Brown did in his first season) to face the opposition. Against Ron Vlaar, one of the best defenders in the division, I think Sagbo would've been the better choice over Ince. We should play 4-4-2 away from home and 3-5-2 at the KC.
     
    #10

  11. WhittlingStick

    WhittlingStick Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,781
    Likes Received:
    501
    ive lost count of the times we have improved after Rosie has come on . . . or we gone to four at the back

    im my head a back 3 of Chester Dawson and Davies with Robbo and Elmo out wide should give the opposition hell , but it doesnt sit well on the pitch :/
     
    #11
  12. jayc89

    jayc89 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    2,274
    Likes Received:
    71
    I said this about 352 last season and I was begin to warm to it against QPR, however against Stoke (initially) and today we looked terrible, Dawson had a pretty nervy debut and Aluko seems to have forgotten how to pass.

    McG
    Rosie Chester Davies Robertson
    Elmo Thudd Livermore Brady
    Jelly Ince

    Robertson has been a sensation. I genuinely didnt expect him to settle in so well.
     
    #12
  13. look_back_in_amber

    look_back_in_amber Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2011
    Messages:
    9,120
    Likes Received:
    7,840
    So then, if Brucey decides we're going with four at the back who is he going to omit, his new signing who looked very rusty today, his captain who had his annual Villa shocker, or Chezzie who's the best ball playing centre half that we've had since Jobbo, or will he attempt to keep all three happy and leave it as a back five?

    Answers on a postcard.
     
    #13
  14. look_back_in_amber

    look_back_in_amber Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2011
    Messages:
    9,120
    Likes Received:
    7,840
    I like, but I can't see him dropping Dawson, and I'd definitely have Hernandez in the place of Ince, who was totally ineffective today.
     
    #14
  15. Steven Toast

    Steven Toast Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    23,264
    Likes Received:
    16,352
    Which formation did we play against Lokeren on Thursday? Was that a 4-4-2? (Obviously before the referee found his whistle.)
     
    #15
  16. Amin Yapusi

    Amin Yapusi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    36,132
    Likes Received:
    16,228
    It doesn't necessarily need to change but with all things there's a time and a place and Villa are one of the teams the 3-5-2 is a bit dodgy against, it just shouldn't have been used today.

    Horses for courses.
     
    #16
  17. Steven Toast

    Steven Toast Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    23,264
    Likes Received:
    16,352
    I know what you mean, against quicker teams it doesn't work so well.
     
    #17
  18. Joe7

    Joe7 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2013
    Messages:
    298
    Likes Received:
    5
    I think it would be naive to permanently change a system which has served us so well over the past two seasons on the back of an admittedly poor performance today.

    That being said, the main weakness of the 3-5-2 system is that if the opposition can get behind the wing backs they can stretch the three centre backs which leads to large holes forming in the middle of the park. Villa, especially in the first half, exploited this vulnerability very well by playing a fluid 4-3-3 with Agbonlahor in particular causing us plenty of problems with his pace. We should've changed the system earlier in first half when this was becoming apparent.
     
    #18
  19. Jezz511

    Jezz511 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    3,771
    Likes Received:
    435
    Whatever fomation if we could stop passing it to a centre half and him launching the ball up to jelavic or elmo, that woul be nice
     
    #19
  20. look_back_in_amber

    look_back_in_amber Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2011
    Messages:
    9,120
    Likes Received:
    7,840
    As I recall that's what Phil Brown did, in around November of our first season in the Prem...yeah that worked, NOT!
     
    #20

Share This Page