I think there's some more, and repeated, communications needed to be honest.The Tigers Trust manage the arena now, it is a fully functioning community hub. The Trust worked with 34,000 people throughout lockdown. They are the new operators of the arena.
The Trust is the community arm of the football club, it is a registered charity, we the OSC, partner and support the Trust both financially and in its work.
IN THE FUTURE, more people will benefit from the arena than ever did whilst the SMC ran it.
Learn lessons from the past and move on for goodness sake.
In the Arena Bar, every home game we (the OSC) have a raffle and open the box competition, one couple come in and sit in the bar area, drink coffee from their flask and eat their sandwiches, when they are asked if they want to buy any raffle tickets they always say "No. we don't want anything to do with the Allams". It used to anger me, other supporters had to stand whilst these freeloaders spouted their nonsense. One day, I stopped being angry as I realised that I had sold a winning ticket to the very next table and they had dipped out on a £185 prize. **** em. They live in the past and not the present.
Whether some like it or not the Arena was tainted by the things that happened, or, if you like, how people interpreted the things that happened.
I liked the post above about the refurb, it looks really good, and I read the article.
Probably me scan reading, but that's what lots of people do, but I didn't realise the Trust were actually managing the Arena. I read it that the club were managing it, but the Trust had refurbed it and were using it for some community work.
I think for the taint to go away, for some people, there needs to be clear communications that by buying a beer there you aren't putting money into the Allam's pocket because while I wouldn't be turning up with a flask obviously some did/do.
Even saying the Trust are managing it won't be enough, people want to see where the money goes. Assuming any profits go into community work then that's a great story...but not one that has been told in that article or elsewhere? (or not picked up by people scanning a HDM article anyway in between the incessant adverts)
Not a criticism, just a thought that's all. If that is something that has already been communicated it clearly hasn't landed yet with those not as close to it
