On their forum a lot are saying replace him with Colback!!! ****ing hell it must be badCan't believe some of them online bitching it wasn't a red.
It was as red a red as you'll see, frankly.
On their forum a lot are saying replace him with Colback!!! ****ing hell it must be badCan't believe some of them online bitching it wasn't a red.
It was as red a red as you'll see, frankly.
On their forum a lot are saying replace him with Colback!!! ****ing hell it must be bad
Was woeful mind! I thought that when I watched it and sky were purring for Gestede! Biro were Lucky at the end mindSheff United's defending for boro's goalPlease can we be up against this standard of defending every week.
You must log in or register to see media
Watching motd. Shearer says "Kane could've seen red but Ritchie was a yellow" Kane played the ball and Ritchie intended to hurt the man from what I saw. No perspective at all
Hopefully a long hard season for the horse punching dog shaggin greggs munching ****s in NE1
Not denying that but Kane's was less intentional. He actually played the ball. That was more my point. Richie intentionally played the man. Kane's was dangerous without intent. Richie's was cynical with intent.Kane's was more dangerous IMO - Richie's was cynical but not dangerous IMO.
Seen red cards for less than Kane's tackle.